Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jerry Sandusky's Wife Tries To Run A Reporter Over

Talkin' Trades: Pronger in black & gold?


Pronger_medium


Chris Pronger

#25 / Defenseman / Anaheim Ducks

6-6

214

Oct 10, 1974




GAP+/-PIM
2008 - Chris Pronger 10 26 36 -1 72


Chiarelli's Checklist

Get bigger ✓

Veteran presence ✓

Defenseman ✓

Power Play help ✓

Recently, the trade rumors surrounding the Boston Bruins have centered on Anaheim defenseman Chris Pronger. The Ducks reportedly want a deal that includes Phil Kessel plus some prospects and/or picks. Yesterday, the Ducks traded for defenseman Ryan Whitney, which could signal the end of Pronger's days in SoCal. The Ducks are looking to clear up some cap space and build for the future by moving Pronger and his $6.25 million contract that will expire at the end of the 2009-2010 season. Chris Pronger and Zdeno Chara would not likely be paired together, but can you imagine having Chara AND Pronger on the blue line for the B's?

Pros
- He is an absolute beast
- Another veteran in the room
- Solid pointman on the PP
- All-around game (only defenseman since Bobby Orr to win Hart Trophy)
- +152 lifetime
- Playoff experience (134 career playoff games)...and a Stanley Cup
- Wouldn't be just a rental player (has one year left on contract)


Cons
- $6.25 million contract
- Phil Kessel would likely be shipped out of town
- Can they get him without tearing up core of team?
- Has a reputation as someone who takes bad penalties
- Can the B's still re-sign some of their expiring contracts with Pronger's $6.25 million cap hit?

Comment 2 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

The Ducks are looking to clear up some cap space and build for the future by moving Pronger and his $6.25 million contract that will expire at the end of the 2009-2010 season.

Cap space really can’t be the reason, I’m guessing. The team has 10 UFAs coming off the books and only really Pronger and Whitney signed to significant deals on the blueline.

I know it’s a popularly-cited reason that’s been used on nearly every Pronger rumor story, but as a guy who looks at next year’s Ducks salary commitments, I think the only reason to trade Pronger is (a) because of the potentially large trade return, or (b) if the Ducks are dead-set on re-signing Niedermayer for a big dollar amount. There’s nothing I can see, though, that suggests that the Ducks have to move Pronger before his contract expires — though from nearly every rumor I read, somehow everyone comes to that conclusion quickly.

http://www.battleofcali.com/

by Earl Sleek on Feb 27, 2009 6:00 PM EST reply actions  

they’ve said again and again that they don’t want to rip up this team…and i think trading kessel would do just that. our defense isn’t that bad (nor is it really that great, but they get the job done). with all of the UFAs we’ll have, taking on a contract like that is just asking for problems. we are already barely going to make the cap next year – why add a nice, but not particularly necessary, 6 mil?

ah well, chia will do it now just to spite me. but that was my train of thought.

by andie on Feb 27, 2009 8:46 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

PUNCH ALL THE WHALES!

Managing Editor

Thomas_small sarahconnors

Durling_headshot_small Ryan Durling

Editors

B75ed5811b_bradmarchand_09262006_small Phunwin

Me_small xokathryn

5531_630546183341_11011139_37429402_2472201_n_small Biz Jacobs

Doug_roma_small dwatson783

Authors

Small Scott Frano

Small Joe Meloni

Resized_small Kristian Limas

Profile_pic_small PeterMacKellar

Cup_small Dave Carignan

Boooyyyccchhuuukkk_small Shelby Lefebvre