Bruins give up 5 unanswered goals as Blackhawks down B's 5-2
The Bruins jumped out to an early 2-goal lead before giving up 5 unanswered goals to fall 5-2 to the Chicago Blackhawks at TD Garden. Bruins may have suffered an even bigger loss tonight though, as Marc Savard left the game with an apparent lower body injury after tweaking what looked like his right knee or leg during the game's first shift.
Blake Wheeler put the Bruins up 1-0 on the power play when he deflected Derek Morris' point shot past Antti Niemi 5:30 into the game.
Miroslav Satan made it 2-0 with his first goal in a Bruins uniform. Satan helped start the play that he ultimately finished with a goal when his forecheck helped create a turnover in the Chicago zone. Blake Wheeler gather the puck in the right wing corner and fed the puck to Satan in the slot and Satan's turn-around wrister found the back of the net at 8:02 of the first period.
Duncan Keith got the Blackhawks on the board at 12:49 of the opening period when he ripped a one-time slapper from the blue line.
The Blackhawks take advantage of Dennis Wideman and Derek Morris' inability to collect the puck deep in the Bruins' zone, which led directly to Tomas Kopecky's game-tying goal with 1:56 remaining in the first period.
The Blackhawks got the go-ahead goal 2 seconds after Zdeno Chara's roughing minor expired, when the Bruins allowed the puck to sit in the slot for just a moment too long and Andrew Ladd cleaned up the rebound for the 3-2 lead 1:42 into the second period.
Duncan Keith scored his second goal of the game 10:13 into the middle period when Keith's shot from the blue line found the back of the net to give the Blackhawks a 4-2 lead after being down 2-0 early in the first period. Tim Thomas looked like he was screened by Zdeno Chara on the play and never got a good look at the puck. The goal chased Thomas (4 goals against on 24 shots) from the game, as Claude Julien sent Tuukka Rask to the crease for the remainder of the game.
Patrick Kane put the final nail in the coffin with 2:11 remaining in the game the when he put the puck in the net from the top of the crease off a feed from behind the net by Troy Brouwer for his his 19th goal of the season.
Notes:
"We didn't manage the puck well tonight and it certainly led to some bad goals"
- Claude Julien
- Milan Lucic made his return to the lineup after recovering from a high ankle sprain. Lucic logged 16:31 of ice time, recorded 5 hits, and finished the night -2.
- Hopefully, the Bruins were just being cautious with Marc Savard and it is not a serious injury. The Bruins can not afford to lose him right now. According to Joe Haggerty, an unidentified player on the Bruins said that Savard "tweaked his right knee".
- The Bruins defensemen looked awful tonight and made some bad decisions with the puck. Dennis Wideman certainly does not look like the premier NHL defenseman that everyone wants us to believe he is.
- Tim Thomas didn't look very good tonight, but he did see a lot of rubber (24 shots in 30:13)
- Tuukka Rask stopped 11 of the 12 shots he faced.
- The Blackhawks outshot the B's 36-21
- The Bruins are back in action Saturday afternoon when the welcome the New York Rangers to TD Garden.
0 recs |
27 comments
|
Comments
I mean lets be honest, we need to trade wideman, thats not even a question, hes a ridiculous liability for a huge pricetag (almost 4 million). and lets not lie to ourselves, should we be taking offers for tim thomas?? tuukka has been the better goalie all year, hes the goalie of tomorrow, except he can carry this team now. thomas just won the vezina, so if we throw his name out there, he would demand a premium. im just thinking, if we package thomas and wideman, we could make a run at any player that will be available come the deadline, and a bunch that arent…..
by BlueNGoldBomber on Jan 7, 2010 10:30 PM EST reply actions
Who would take Wideman’s $4 million contract?
I like the way the Tuukka/Timmy Tandem is working. Rask probably isn’t ready to play every night and Thomas has never been a guy that can play a lot of games. I like the mentor/student relationship there. Also, I’m not sure what the market for a 35 year old goalie with a long-term contract is going to be.
by Stanley Cup of Chowder on Jan 7, 2010 10:53 PM EST up reply actions
It would be a massive salary dump and no one would take it. We can’t send him down because
a) his cap hit still would apply
b) someone would pick him up at half price on the way back up
c) Who would play with Tuukka? Kevin Regan?
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Jan 7, 2010 11:23 PM EST up reply actions
(This post about Thomas)
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Jan 7, 2010 11:25 PM EST up reply actions
Ok, so who plays defense if wideman’s out?
Chara – Morris
Stuart – Boychuk
Hunwick – McQuaid
Wozniewski?
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Jan 7, 2010 11:26 PM EST up reply actions
Bring back Ward to play D
He was waived by Carolina, but I believe that he’s still with them. He’d be cheap, dependable and would be a perfect locke room fit.
Heck, we might be able to work a trace with Carolina for Wideman and pry a scorer out of them.
bt
So are we now going to start a line of HFBoards unworkable and/or ridiculous trade proposals for Wideman? E.g.:
TO FLAMES
Wideman
1st and 2nd
TO BRUINS
Bourque
Regehr
please no
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Jan 8, 2010 10:22 AM EST up reply actions
quick question for you guys
I wanted to ask this before the game tonite so it didn’t seem like i was here trying to to get another shot in after this game. But something i didn’t understand and couldn’t find a real answer to on-line is… Why for the winter classic did you guys not play the Rangers? it just seemed like the obvious choice. 2 original 6 teams, u get that whole NY vs. Boston thing that is played up ALL the time, and the game was in FENWAY!!!! how doesn’t the Yanks/Sox thing automatically come to play. anyway if anybody can give me a stright forward reason for the choice that was made i would appreciate it greatly. good luck with the rest of your season and… GO HAWKS… sorry i had to get it in somewhere. lol
by soupy's spin-o-rama on Jan 8, 2010 3:27 AM EST reply actions
So that they could host one in new york.
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Jan 8, 2010 7:20 AM EST up reply actions
Also, philly is a HUGE tv market.
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Jan 8, 2010 7:20 AM EST up reply actions
go to more bruins/rags games in new york. You’ll hate them plenty.
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Jan 8, 2010 7:46 AM EST up reply actions
yeah that too, but the MSG crowd is distilled. 18,000 ranger fans from new york in one building.
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Jan 8, 2010 7:56 AM EST up reply actions
That’s exactly the reason I’m glad it wasn’t the Rangers.
The stupid comparison to Yankees/Red Sox would have been endless.
I personally would have liked to have seen Montreal, but I guess they’re not a large enough market to attract US viewers.
Glad its not just in the Midwest
That people are sick of Yanks/Sox everywhere and its not just here. Don’t get me wrong i thought the game was great. i just never found a stright answer for the reasons. Anyway I hope you guys have a great rest of your season, and ur players start getting healthy again.
by soupy's spin-o-rama on Jan 8, 2010 4:54 PM EST up reply actions
5 Unanswered?
C’mon.
full disclosure, I didn’t watch the game. Caught pieces of it with Bob and Dan on the radio.
This inconsistency has gotten old. Yas, yas, Chicago is a great team, greta scoring, but puhlease….with effort on D you can usually hold a 2 goal lead. On any team (except the 80’s Oilers). If the D were more committed (Wideman) as well as the Forwards then you’d think that the B’s could’ve squeeked out at least a tie.
That said, it’s not Thomas that’s the problem. It’s the team in front of him. Specifically it’s the leadership on the team. Not to beat the “Ward drum” louder, but I just gotta believe that with him still there (with a well timed forearm shivver) that this team plays harder, is harder to play against, and definitly pulls a point or two out of this game.
Trade Thomas? No. Trade Wideman? Yes. Bundle him with one of the Toronto picks for a shooter and brind Ward or someone like him back.
bt
The blackhawks are the best team in the league with some very potent scorers and excellent defensemen. Toews is a +20 halfway through the season and I wouldn’t be surprised if he beat Wheeler’s total last year.
This team is averaging over a goal per game more than they’re allowing. That’s even better now than we were last year.
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Jan 8, 2010 10:50 AM EST up reply actions
Yes,
In short….their Olympians are better than our Olympians.
bt
It’s ok because come february they’re all our olympians.
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Jan 8, 2010 11:20 AM EST up reply actions
Bruins Announcers
Rabid New England Displaced Hawks fan here.
Caught the game on NESN, was kinda deterred that the B’s announcers could not slob the knob of the Hawks enough. Great, the Hawks are really really good in all facets of the game, but come on. Was it just me or did they talk to much about the HAwks and not enough about how the B’s can counter them. Oh they did after the 10min mark in the third when the Hawks pulled off of the 200’ attack, and gave something like the Hawks are weak on the backcheck.
Perhaps it is because I watch every Hawks game I can and already know how good they can be and that the Boston market may have heard about it, but not really seen it. I’m sure the Hawks love getting it polished, I would expect Eddie and Pat (Hawks announcers) to be like that, but I think it was kinda sad for Bruins fans watching NESN, and only hearing Hawks, Hawks, Hawks.
by Toews-makes-funny-faces on Jan 8, 2010 2:33 PM EST reply actions
Jack has a joygasm every time a goal is scored, regardless of the team, so uber-praise for the Hawks play isn’t too surprizing.
Considering how good the hawks are and especially were in that game? Not surprising at all.
Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Jan 9, 2010 10:09 AM EST up reply actions
That was obviously making fun of Jersey Shore, but just wasn’t done very well. The great P.J. Stock should never have been associated with that.
by Stanley Cup of Chowder on Jan 9, 2010 10:58 AM EST up reply actions

by 

















