Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Explaining Jeremy Lin's Early, Surprising Success

Savard Deal to be Blocked?

After the Iyla Kovalchuk mess, arbitrator Kevin Boch will be looking at four other contracts: Chris Pronger, Roberto Loungo, Marian Hossa, and our own Marc Savard.

We know the Bruins have been trying to trade Savard's $4.007 mm all offseason long. So if he becomes a free agent, how likely are they to retain him now?

You all know my stance; I have never wanted to trade him. But with this news reaching the Bruins, do they want to trade him now to get value for him beacuse of the posibility of impending free agency?

Many FanPosts are written by readers and do not necessarily reflect the views of Stanley Cup of Chowder, SB Nation, their sponsors, or business partners.

Comment 24 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

absolutely insane. ex post facto’s cool with the NHL then? Can Cooke get suspended now too?

by TomServo42 on Aug 10, 2010 11:41 AM EDT reply actions  

It’s written into the CBA that this can happen, and the deal hasn’t kicked in yet.

Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Aug 10, 2010 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

haven’t read in detail. i presume they can’t touch one-year-old contracts like Hossa?

by TomServo42 on Aug 10, 2010 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

They are investigating Hossa's deal

That place was for diehard sports fans. I only follow my team when they're in the playoffs" - Homer Simpson
Join the Lacrosse community The Lacrosse Blog

by bestbostonsports on Aug 10, 2010 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

They can touch any contract, even an approved one. They can fine, remove draft picks, and even nullify games. But I don’t see them crapping on chicago right now.

Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Aug 10, 2010 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

I wish

That place was for diehard sports fans. I only follow my team when they're in the playoffs" - Homer Simpson
Join the Lacrosse community The Lacrosse Blog

by bestbostonsports on Aug 10, 2010 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

You still have time to edit the title of this post to “Bloched”

Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Aug 10, 2010 11:47 AM EDT reply actions  

But I mean like the Arbiter, Bloch.

Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Aug 10, 2010 12:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

I know

I screwed up making a reference/joke. It happens.

by Arenacale on Aug 10, 2010 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

They’re not going to undo this based on the Kovalchuk deal.

by Phunwin on Aug 10, 2010 12:27 PM EDT reply actions  

Linking a sports law blog on the subject. Informative supplemental reading:
http://offsidesportsblog.blogspot.com/2010/08/analysis-of-kovalchuk-decision.html

by TomServo42 on Aug 10, 2010 1:03 PM EDT reply actions  

I’ll wait for SCoC’s write up on this one….if he does it

but there’s no way the NHL kills all those deals….unless they want another friggin lockout.

by delta on Aug 10, 2010 4:59 PM EDT reply actions  

Just to clear up a misconception in bestbostonsport’s post, Bloch will not be looking at these contracts unless they go to arbitration and he is assigned to hear the case. Bloch is a neutral party. He does not work for the league and cannot investigate player’s contract situations.

by Stanley Cup of Chowder on Aug 10, 2010 5:46 PM EDT reply actions  

Thanks for clearing that up

That place was for diehard sports fans. I only follow my team when they're in the playoffs" - Homer Simpson
Join the Lacrosse community The Lacrosse Blog

by bestbostonsports on Aug 10, 2010 5:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

This was mainly made

to speculate pointlesly with absolutly nothing going on

That place was for diehard sports fans. I only follow my team when they're in the playoffs" - Homer Simpson
Join the Lacrosse community The Lacrosse Blog

by bestbostonsports on Aug 10, 2010 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

I just wrote this, I believe

thank you

That place was for diehard sports fans. I only follow my team when they're in the playoffs" - Homer Simpson
Join the Lacrosse community The Lacrosse Blog

by bestbostonsports on Aug 10, 2010 11:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Honestly, I think Savard’s deal is one of the least likely to be nullified. Now that Pronger and Luongo deals though…

by BruinsSelectSeguin on Aug 11, 2010 2:06 AM EDT reply actions  

i wouldn't say that

why wouldn’t they? they all are constructed the same way

by delta on Aug 11, 2010 9:53 AM EDT reply actions  

Of the lot, Savard’s has the shortest term, and doesn’t push him past 40 by the end. Although I think Pronger’s is just as long but he’ll be 42 at the end of it.

by BruinsSelectSeguin on Aug 11, 2010 4:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Pronger’s is also a 35+ contract so the team is on the hook for the cap hit even if he does retire.

Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Aug 11, 2010 5:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Roughly speaking, Hossa’s is the least likely to be nullified, since he’s already been paid a year. I don’t care WHAT the CBA says about the league’s ability to look into contracts, if the guy’s already a year into it, it’s not getting voided. If the contract is invalid, do they take his name off the Stanley Cup? Redo the finals without Hossa? Does poor Hossa have to give up his long-awaited (and much-deserved) Stanley Cup ring? It opens up a can of worms that’s far easier to leave unopened.

Then Pronger, since the Flyers (snicker) will get stuck with the cap hit anyway, so it can’t be circumvention.

Then Savard, since it’s entirely possible he’ll still be playing at 39.

by Phunwin on Aug 12, 2010 9:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

Right, they’re sorta stuck now. Hossa’s contract is the next-worse offender but they’re not about to vacate the stanley cup in chicago or make him a free agent when Chicago’s already blown up the team.

I could see them maybe trying to cut off a year or two of Luongo’s, which would be hilarious. Imagine if we had a player with a 5m+ cap hit putting up Thomas numbers…for 10 years.

Join me on the Hockey Blog Adventure! (or Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Aug 12, 2010 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

PUNCH ALL THE WHALES!

Managing Editor

Thomas_small sarahconnors

Durling_headshot_small Ryan Durling

Editors

B75ed5811b_bradmarchand_09262006_small Phunwin

Me_small xokathryn

5531_630546183341_11011139_37429402_2472201_n_small Biz Jacobs

Doug_roma_small dwatson783

Authors

Small Scott Frano

Small Joe Meloni

Resized_small Kristian Limas

Profile_pic_small PeterMacKellar

Cup_small Dave Carignan

Boooyyyccchhuuukkk_small Shelby Lefebvre