Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jon Jones Arrested on Suspicion of DUI

Always looking ahead.......


     Let's be honest, I am an optimist when it comes to the Bruins, always have been, always will be. Along with that, comes excitement about current times, but it also leads me to constantly look ahead. I just read a story on puck daddy about how after this season, Shea Weber may be on the move. Who knows what will happen with that over the next year.

     Now I did a post like this like 2 months ago, and now things are completely different.

     Looking ahead to next years squad, lets assume the same increase in salary cap from last year. Last year, the cap went from 56.4 million to 59.4 million, up 3 million dollars. So let's say that the cap goes from 59.4 to 62.4, not an unreasonable thought that it would grow at the same pace.


     So after this season, we have 4 free agents, Blake Wheeler, Michael Ryder, Brad Marchand and Mark Stuart. We will have 9 forewards, 6 defenseman, and 2 goalies that are seeing regular time this season, and will still be under contract next year. All of the contracts we have on the books total 46.7 million commited, leaving us with a modest 15.7 million dollars to play with as of now. Now, if you subtract bonuses and incentives that will be taken off of our cap room next year, and that number shrinks to 12.83 million. Now I must say, that if you asked me at the beginning of the season, I didn't see a lot of scenarios where I was ok with Blake Wheeler and Michael Ryder coming back to this team, but I must say, for the right price, I would be ok with both of them coming back.

     Michael Ryder was the guy that I was completely sure was on his way out of town. I couldn't stand watching him play during last years regular season. Then he had a pretty good post season, and I thought maybe. Ryder has had a somewhat quiet season, however without much notice, he is on pace for either 22 or 23 goals. He is a streaky scorer, so maybe he gets hot towards the end of the year, and puts in 25 this season. Players with similar numbers seem to be hovering in the 2 million dollar range. If I am the Bruins, I would definately bring Ryder back for that price tag. He is a guy that will be playing somewhere between the 2nd and 3rd lines, and would be able to produce some goal scoring. I think he is a great fit for that price tag.

     Then, we come to the issue of Blake Wheeler. He is on pace for 16 goals, and 35 points. Let's face facts, Wheeler is 4th line guy, maybe 3rd if someone is hurt. He should make roughly 1-1.5 million in his next contract. Problem is, I don't think Wheeler realizes that he is pretty bad at this whole "hockey" thing. He is probably on his way out the door.

     I look for Marchand to get about 1.5 million over 2 years or so. Take that in a second.

     Then comes the situation at the blue line. It has been the achillies heel of this team all year. They are a great shut down defense, probably the best in the league. However, they are obnoxiously incompitent at breaking out of their zone. They NEED a puck moving defenseman. This is where we could see one of our defesemen moving, probably one of the more physical ones. Steven Kampfer has been a huge, pleasant surprise (thats what she said), as he has shown some true puck moving potential. He looks like he has the same mindset as Matt Hunwick, except he can actually perform. So he is off limits. Seidenberg is the unsung hero of this team, and he is very affordable for the next 4 years. He is going nowhere. Ference is probably not going anywhere. So it comes down to Boychuk, Mcquaid or Stuart. One of those 3 are probably on their way out, to make room for a quality puck moving defenseman. All 3 of these guys are great, physical defenseman, however, their styles are too similar, and there is a logjam of physicality on the blue line. One of the will go for a puck moving d-man. I would venture to say it's probably not Boychuk, more likely Mcquaid as a trade, or Stuart this year at the deadline.

   Saying all of that, here we go... (note: number after the name is how many years player is signed for after this one)

Lucic (2) - Krejci (1) - Horton (2)

Ryder (?) - Bergeron (3) - Seguin (2)

Caron (2) - Savard (6) - Marchand (?)

Thornton (1) - Campbell (1) - Paille (1)

Chara (7) - Kampfer (2)

Seidenberg (3) - New guy (?)

Boychuk (1) - Ference (2)

Thomas (2)

Rask (1)

     So I guess we'll just talk about the elephant in the room, and that is the status of Marc Savard. Thing is, if Savard is playing, we are spending 4 million on a third line center. However, if Savard is not available, that frees up a spot, and cap room, when the organization has depth at center. I am writing Savard in, because obviously, this team is better with him in the lineup, and I would much rather have him playing.

     Now, assuming Marchand nets 1.5, and Ryder nets 2.5, that leaves us with about 10 million in cap room to pay for a new puck moving defenseman. Obviously, that isn't all going to be spent on a shiny new defenseman, but it leaves the Bruins room to move for one. They have 3 players looking for pay raises after next season, so they will probably only be able to spend like 3-4 million on a new guy, but that could get us a guy like an Ian White or a Christian Ehrhoff. Now I am not saying that the Bruins will sign one of those two for sure, but they will have cap room to make a run at a guy of that skill level.

     So long story short, if I am Peter Chiarelli, I would tell Blake to take a hike, sign Ryder for cheap, leave the rest of the forewards alone, and use our new found cap relief for a good young puck moving defenseman, even if it comes at the cost of one of our good young physical guys.

Poll
Which of the 3 would you rather keep?
Adam Mcquaid
7 votes
Johnny Boychuk
41 votes
Mark Stuart
8 votes

56 votes | Poll has closed

Many FanPosts are written by readers and do not necessarily reflect the views of Stanley Cup of Chowder, SB Nation, their sponsors, or business partners.

Comment 15 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

keep wheels and ryder for a pay cut

then get staurt and mcquaid back on our d line. i almost always agree with bluengoldbomber about players but the diff between us is he wants ‘a puck moving dman’ and i want 1 solid effing scorer for a change

by muffinman on Jan 26, 2011 6:12 PM EST reply actions  

i like how u did my post

only WAY better than i could have. ahahahaha

by muffinman on Jan 26, 2011 6:18 PM EST reply actions  

lol yeah, my bad… i started to leave it as a comment, but got way too long winded lol

by BlueNGoldBomber on Jan 26, 2011 7:13 PM EST up reply actions  

no problem

u said what i could not. not a good typer as everyone knows

by muffinman on Jan 26, 2011 10:34 PM EST up reply actions  

The name you’re looking for is “Tomas Kaberle”.

by Phunwin on Jan 26, 2011 6:40 PM EST reply actions  

Not so sure about that...

I’m not so sure Kaberle would be the answer… He’s a good puck moving Dman without a contract for next year, yes, but how can you be so sure that he’s gonna settle for less than his 4.25/yr cap hit… with that in mind (and muffinman’s comment looming), why not possibly spend a bit more on a solid scorer?

by Joe McShane on Jan 26, 2011 7:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Look at it this way...

…and if you look at it a different way, Lucic is our leading scorer this year. Don’t get me wrong, I love the kid and I couldn’t be happier he’s having a great year, but I know somebody here called him “Mr. Meaningless Goal,” which, even though I’d like to, your leading scorer shouldn’t be leading mostly because of empty-netters and tip-ins (though he has had some awesome ones as well).

Similarly, Bergy has the most points at 40 and the rest of our forwards that people have come to love (Ryder and Horton) are simply known around the league as “streaky…” once again, meaning they’re either going to put up a hat trick or continue a 15 game slide without a point. Put it any way you want, but that just says “inconsistency.”

Compare that to other teams atop the league and you have guys like Stamkos with 38 goals by himself and Henrik Sedin with 50 assists, and you start to realize why we were last in goals scored last season.

Savard on the other hand, our “ace in the hole” as far as forwards with talent go, has had WAY too many concussions (personally, I think he hangs on to it too long and just doesn’t absorb hits well, but you can’t deny the team plays better with him on the ice) to even be considered a threat to teams right now and I really don’t see him producing much at all for the rest of the season, if at all.

Now, It’s great we have a bunch of guys that “all can score and produce,” but that’s simply because there’s not one guy that you have to truly gameplan for like you would a Sidney Crosby or an Ovechkin (who still put up the points). If we had that one more guy, we could be that “team to beat” every single night; not just when Ryder or Wheeler or Horton are hot.

by Joe McShane on Jan 27, 2011 8:21 AM EST up reply actions  

we are tied for 6th in the league in goals per game, with pittsburgh, and we are a full half goal per game ahead of washington, whos “big snipers” are slumping like a mother. ovechkin has had a bad year, and washington’s entire offense has slumped. crosby has had a hell of a year, but noone else on that team can put the puck in the net, they only have one guy in the top 50 in the league in goals, chris kunitz at number 50. long story short, a balanced scoring attack is a better option than droping 10 million into a top tier scorer (see kovalchuk, ilya).

what this team needs is a guy who is able to break the puck out of his own zone on a consistent basis, which will give them more opportunities to score on a consistent basis.

by BlueNGoldBomber on Jan 27, 2011 11:53 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Finally.....

I am glad someone brought up that we are in the top third of the league in goals for this year so I dont think that searching for a scorer is really the main need. Lets be honest in saying that yes as disappointing as its been that Horton has not scored a lot this year he has had some real bad luck with posts and bounces and what not. At least unlike Ryder, Horton actually is responsible in his own end and has the plus/minus to go with it. At some point Horton will score that goal to get the monkey off his back and then we can only hope he gets some of those bounces back and goes on a bit of a tear like he was at the start of the season. I would still say Horton has contributed to Lucic’s 20 goals because as good as Looch has been this year teams would still put someone on Horton over Looch and that frees up Looch to get some opportunities.

I would much rather fork out the money for a Kaberle/Ehrhoff (after watching Ian White in Toronto for a few years I would stay away from him and his stats show the story with only 7 assists in 32 games this year he is definately not the answer). Better breakouts, give you better transition, which lead to offensive opportunities and those are what lead to goals. What good does it do to pay a high priced scorer to come in if we have not remedied our breakout issues?? He cant score playing defence in his own zone.

Not being from Boston I dont get all the news but it did sound like Horton was getting the jeers from the Beantown fans last night so I am curious if that was the case?? I know he hasnt scored much but at least he isnt floating around and hes even dropped the mitts a few times too….whats the local take on Horton??

by beachguy113 on Jan 27, 2011 1:32 PM EST up reply actions  

i have only heard good things about horton. its frusterating yeah,but i havent really heard of anyone turning on him. like you said, he is responsible in his own end, and plays a decent physical game for a foreward. it seems like even though he isn’t putting the puck in the net, he isn’t letting that fact effect the rest of his game. he is still working his ass off, and it seems like people understand that

by BlueNGoldBomber on Jan 27, 2011 3:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Well, he didn’t score a hat trick and fight everyone on the other team, so obviously he’s a lazy floater and we should ship him back to the mushroom kingdom.

Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Year in Review: Your 2010 Boston Bruins. The Good, the Bad, the Loss to Philly (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Jan 27, 2011 5:07 PM EST up reply actions  

TAHMEE FROM QWINZEE HEAH

BOWSAH, YA GOTTA TAKE HIM BACK AND GIVE US A FACKIN’ HAMMAH BROTHAH!!! HOHTON JUST AIN’T DOIN’ IT AND WE NEED THE SCOH-RING!

by Arenacale on Jan 31, 2011 8:40 AM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

PUNCH ALL THE WHALES!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Durling_headshot_small
NHL Playoffs 2012: Western Conference Finals Game Three Open Thread
Small
Dougie Hamilton OHL Jersey
Looch-t_cap_small
LA Kings - 2012 Stanley Cup Champions?
Durling_headshot_small
Belated USA-Canada IIHF Open Thread
Axe_small
Wishlist!
Milt_schmidt_small
The All-Boston Team: Summer Project
Small
Chance to win a Bruins Prize pack, anyone else have a few minutes for a university project?!
246904_10150207466208058_559893057_6815629_7738165_n_small
He said she said trade rumor thread
Small
NHL Playoff Format
Small
Thanks Chowder

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor

Thomas_small sarahconnors

Durling_headshot_small Ryan Durling

Editors

B75ed5811b_bradmarchand_09262006_small Phunwin

Me_small xokathryn

5531_630546183341_11011139_37429402_2472201_n_small Biz Jacobs

Doug_roma_small dwatson783

Authors

Small Scott Frano

Resized_small Kristian Limas

Profile_pic_small PeterMacKellar

427799_10150607786667127_578457126_9253226_1796777750_n_small Dave Carignan

Boooyyyccchhuuukkk_small Shelby Lefebvre