Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Jon Jones Arrested on Suspicion of DUI

Bruins 2011-12 Preview: The Defense

The Bruins' defense in 2010-11 was made to look a heck of a lot better than it really was by the otherworldly goaltending of Tim Thomas.  The bad news is that the Bruins probably can't expect Thomas to be that good again (that's usually what happens when you set an NHL record). The good news is that the defense should improve.  There's too much talent here for this unit to surrender over 32 shots per game again.  Let's take a look at the unit, one by one:

Zdeno Chara - Any discussion of the Bruin defense must begin with the 6'9 behemoth with a Norris Trophy to his credit.  Chara consistently takes on (and bests) the opposition's best scorers, takes the majority of his draws in the defensive zone, soaks up ice time like a sponge, and consistently makes his defensive partner look a whole lot better than he often is.  At 34, Chara's career is entering the autumn years, but he is the type of player whose game should age pretty well; size and positioning don't diminish with age like some other skills.  Chara also plays on the first unit of the power play, and with the hardest shot in the NHL, he brings a real weapon to the unit. He is, by any reasonable measure, one of the top defensemen in the NHL, and should be for at least a few more years.

Star-divide

Dennis Seidenberg - Boston's putative #2 defenseman, the career journeyman was a playoff hero, teaming with Chara, soaking up every bit as much ice time as the big man, and boasting a mighty +12 in the playoffs.  However, Seidenberg was nothing special in the regular season, with a pedestrian +3, and consistently proving unable to carry his own pairing on ice.  So, either he came into his own in the playoffs, or he's just another example of a guy who was made better by Chara.  At 30 years old, the latter is more likely than the former, and Claude Julien might be well advised to leave Seidenberg paired with Chara, rather than ask him to carry the second pairing.  Seidenberg, like most of Boston's defensemen, is above average in terms of offensive skill, but not truly dynamic.  He has no gaping holes in his game, but nothing that stands out as a true plus skill, save for his endurance. 

Adam McQuaid - McQuaid was an absolute revelation last season, going from an I-95 Piker to a fixture in Boston's defense.  Measured by even-strength on ice plus-minus over 60 minutes, McQuaid was Boston's best defenseman last year.  McQuaid showed significantly better than advertised offensive skill, as well, though that was more the cherry than the sundae.  Like many of the Bruin defensemen, McQuaid is still fairly young (25 later this month), and thus has room to improve.  He'll have to; his -2.9 Corsi needs some work, but his positioning should improve a bit, he's got a fairly good head for the game and doesn't take a lot of unnecessary chances.  If the Bruins pair Chara and Seidenberg on the top pair, as they should, McQuaid should prove quite capable of anchoring the second pair.

Johnny Boychuk - Boychuk is, in many ways, an infuriating player.  You want to love him because he throws his body around with reckless abandon, generating highlight-reel hits.  You want to love him because he boasts a slapshot surpassed only by Zdeno Chara.  And then, he'll make a boneheaded play that creates a great scoring chance for the bad guys.  Indeed, Boychuk very nearly cost the Bruins the Tampa Bay series with some brainless play.  For his frustrating playoffs, Boychuk wasn't all bad, as a regular season Corsi of 7.39 can attest, although he benefited from frequent pairings with Chara.  Apart from his slapper, Boychuk has some real offensive skill, and is at least adequate at moving the puck.  And his physical play is rivaled only by McQuaid and surpassed only by Chara on the Bruin blue line.  Unfortunately, he's often the case of a million dollar body with a ten-cent head.  At 27, it's questionable whether he'll cut down on those lapses. 

Andrew Ference - After a positively dreadful 2009-10 campaign that culminated in a contract extension so inexplicable that it had to be a product of the dark arts, Ference redeemed himself as much as any Bruin last year.  Ference became one of the team's most respected leaders in the locker room and on the ice and provided quality second and third pair play en route to an impressive +22 rating.  Alas, though beloved by teammates, Ference is a very limited hockey player.  His 70 games played last year were the highest in 5 years, and at 32, he's hardly likely to become less brittle.  He's not a gifted offensive player and is very susceptible to the forecheck, and isn't good enough positionally to cover for a teammate's lapses, as last year's playoffs showed.  Ference is an above-average third pair defenseman, but giving him top four minutes is likely to burn the Bruins. 

Joe Corvo - Corvo came over to the Bruins in what amounted to a swap for Tomas Kaberle.  So, we might be well served using the guy he was "traded" for as a measuring stick.  Unlike the dearly departed Kaberle, Corvo has a big shot and isn't afraid to use it, and is a significantly better skater than the slow-footed Czech.  Like Kaberle, he has excellent offensive instincts and is a welcome addition to a power play.  Unfortunately, Corvo plays an extremely high risk game, and has subpar defensive instincts, neither of which are likely to change at the age of 34.  As much as Kaberle was maligned in Boston, his positioning was quite sound, and that's a huge issue for Corvo.  Neither one has been known to throw a check. Corvo was one of the better defensemen on a terrible Carolina unit last year, with a +0.7 relative Corsi, and was just behind Tim Gleason for the toughest quality of competition.  Corvo is also extraordinarily streaky, and Bruin fans need to be prepared for anything from him, from night to night.

Steven Kampfer - Kampfer looked to have the inside track on the 7th defenseman job, but has a sprained MCL in his left knee and will be out 2-4 weeks.  Kampfer is a plus puck mover with a decent shot.  He's on the smallish side, and not terribly physical, and is, of course, prone to the mistakes of youth, being just 23.  If Corvo's defensive lapses/indifference cause Claude Julien to tear out whatever remaining hairs he has left, Kampfer could find himself as the quarterback on the second power play unit, and with a regular shift. 

Matt Bartkowski - With Kampfer's injury, Bartkowski figures to have the 7th defenseman job for the time being.  Bigger and more physical than Kampfer, Bartkowski lacks Kampfer's plus offensive instincts, but is an adequate skater, and with some experience, could be an above-average 3rd pair defenseman. 

Colby Cohen - Cohen was one of the better defensive prospects in a strong Colorado system last year.  It's possible that he could see some action if there's some injuries, but he appears to be well behind Kampfer and Bartkowski in the race for playing time. 

David Warsofky - A little guy with a mammoth shot, he'll play in Providence this year, without much chance of seeing the big club.

Dougie Hamilton - The future franchise blue liner will be spending the 2011-12 campaign back in the juniors. They're in no hurry to rush him, nor should they be.


Pairings::

One hopes the Bruins will stick with the Chara/Seidenberg pairing that was so effective in last year's playoffs, and that the days of asking Seidenberg to carry his own pair are over.  But if the Bruins get hung up on pairing right and left shots (and they shouldn't), then Boychuk would be the likely choice for the top pair, and Seidenberg and McQuaid could be on the second pair.  In any case, it would make sense to pair Ference and Corvo, since Ference's responsible defensive positioning would cover for at least some of Corvo's bad gambles, while Corvo's mobility would keep opposing forecheckers at bay. 

Overall:

The Bruin defense has talent; they're above average pretty much everywhere, and for all the teeth-gnashing about the lack of a puck moving defenseman over the years, the Bruins are quite mobile at the blue line, with only Ference below average in that area.  Everyone but Corvo and Kampfer plays a physical brand of hockey, and defensive positioning is pretty good for most of these guys.  So what gives?  Why did Boston give up 32.7 shots per night last year?

Let's work backward a few years.  In 2009-10, the Bruins gave up a much more respectable 29.8 shots per game, which was 14th best in the NHL.  However, in 2008-9 and 2007-8, the Bruins were back in the bottom 10 in shots allowed.  For all the talk about Julien's defense-first system, there seems to be evidence that the Bruins are much more of a fire-wagon hockey team than they want to let on.  Boston's 32.9 shots per game were the 3rd most in the NHL, after all.  The philosophy on defense has been to try and shift everything to the outside, and force low quality shots, which the Bruins seem willing to live with.  Shot quality metrics are questionable at best, so this is more of an observation than  statistical analysis.  But it does explain some of the disconnect between the ability of Boston's defense, and the high shot totals they surrender.

In any case, since Tim Thomas isn't stopping 93.8% of the shots he sees again, the group must cut down the shots allowed, one way or another.  Some improvement from McQuaid and, to a lesser extent, Seidenberg should be forthcoming, and there's not a good candidate for decline, though Corvo is a real wild card. 

Offensively, the Bruins are in good shape.  Chara, Corvo and Seidenberg will all contribute and put up points.  Puck movement is not an issue, and they should be able to get the puck to a very deep group of forwards.  As for the man advantage, talent on the back end is not Boston's problem on the power play; the lack of a #1 power play center is, but that's another article.  This unit should at least hold its own on the power play and the attack.  A speedy return to health by Kampfer would help mightily here, especially if Corvo doesn't pan out. 

Ultimately, though, Boston's defensemen will be measured by that shot total, and it should improve this year.  Maybe not dramatically, but enough to take some heat off the goaltending.

Comment 41 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I think Seids and Chare make a very good shutdown pair. I think there is degree of the
Chara factor where Chara makes his partner look good, but I also think there is an element of complementary play where their styles work together to make a hard pair to play against.

I would like to see them kept together, but I think the team needs to address the lack of a second pairing anchor. Ference and Boychuk made do but they were a defensive weak link. I think Ference shines best when anchoring a 3rd pair. I hope Chia is looking for a trade to improve.

by TCL40 on Oct 3, 2011 1:03 PM EDT reply actions  

I think it’s more a case of “Chara could make a pylon look good”, but whatever the case, they should stick together.

I am pretty confident that McQuaid will be the second pair anchor, but I wouldn’t mind them upgrading somewhere in the bottom 4. Robyn Regehr would have been a perfect fit, but alas, that ship has long since sailed.

by Phunwin on Oct 3, 2011 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Adianoeta Alert!

Chara could make Sloth from The Goonies look good.

I can't seriously be asked to summarize my sports fandom in a short blurb for all to see, can I?

by Johnny Appleseed on Oct 4, 2011 4:31 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

If Sloth could skate, he wouldn’t be that bad! Huge guy. Probably turns like an aircraft carrier, but that reach would have kept opposing forwards at bay. Really, he wouldn’t be any worse than Hal Gill.

by Phunwin on Oct 4, 2011 8:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

Stanley Cup Champion Hal Gill?

(ps he is @skillsy75 on twitter now)

Your 2011 Stanley Cup Champion Boston Bruins
Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Playoffs in Pictures: Round 1 Game 1+2 Habs @ Bruins (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Oct 4, 2011 10:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

Should that be ‘skillless’? Would be far more accurate.

Corny… you see my comment about BBC and pumpkins?

by BobbyOrrsBastard on Oct 4, 2011 10:19 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

The trick is gonna be getting out to pembroke and back in time for the game saturday night

Your 2011 Stanley Cup Champion Boston Bruins
Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Playoffs in Pictures: Round 1 Game 1+2 Habs @ Bruins (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Oct 4, 2011 10:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

You could always give your tickets to me and just watch the game at BBC in all its pumpkiny glory…

by BobbyOrrsBastard on Oct 4, 2011 10:24 AM EDT up reply actions  

hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

Your 2011 Stanley Cup Champion Boston Bruins
Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Playoffs in Pictures: Round 1 Game 1+2 Habs @ Bruins (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Oct 4, 2011 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

Figured it was worth a shot…

by BobbyOrrsBastard on Oct 4, 2011 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

can’t blame you for that

Your 2011 Stanley Cup Champion Boston Bruins
Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Playoffs in Pictures: Round 1 Game 1+2 Habs @ Bruins (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Oct 4, 2011 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

Considering Corvo’s TOI the last few years and reliance as a top-pair Dman in Carolina and McQuaid’s defensive ability wouldn’t it make sense to pair the two on the second line?

McQ could cover for some of Corvo’s riskier gambits while Corvo provides the offense and veteran leadership. The guy was eating 24 minutes a night last season so the drop to 18-20 should give his legs a boost and hopefully make him more effective. Would allow for Ference to cover Boychuk’s gaffes on the third pairing and provide solid offense while maintaining defensive responsibility from all three pairings.

by BobbyOrrsBastard on Oct 3, 2011 1:43 PM EDT reply actions  

I thought about Corvo/McQuaid on the second pair. If we get Good Corvo, it makes sense to give him more ice time. Here’s why I would avoid that, though:

1. Ference is the least mobile Boston defenseman. Corvo the most (it’s either him or Kampfer). If the Bruins put Boychuk and Ference out there together, they might as well flash on the scoreboard “Opposing forecheckers welcome!” Having Corvo out there with Ference should keep the bad guys at bay, however. I grant that McQuaid isn’t a whole lot better than Ference in this department, but if we’re going to cover for one of them, it should be Ference.

2. The Ference/Boychuk pairing was a disaster in most of last year’s playoffs. I would like to avoid seeing it again.

by Phunwin on Oct 3, 2011 2:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m still hoping Boychuk gets traded at some point in time. A healthy Kampfer plus some good play from Bartkowski could push that issue.

Then, the third line could be Kampfer and Ference and the second line Corvo and McQuaid.

by Bourque77 on Oct 3, 2011 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’d rather hold onto Boychuk if only for the depth. Any return in trade for him likely wouldn’t be worth the risk that would come from the weakened depth. I just don’t see Bart being ready for more than a limited 3rd pair role which wears on a team over time. He is fine as an 8th D but I don’t like him as the 7th… not yet anyways.

by BobbyOrrsBastard on Oct 3, 2011 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

At some point in time this year, I see the Bruins making a trade for a defencemen and I don’t see Boychuk being a top 7 D with the team after that deal.

Whether that happens no or at the deadline, I don’t know. But I don’t see Boychuk dressing come playoff time this year, so I don’t see the big concern in dealing him now.

by Bourque77 on Oct 3, 2011 8:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would love to see the Bruins package Boychuk with a prospect and a pick to get a true top 4 defenseman.

by Phunwin on Oct 3, 2011 8:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think Boychuk will have a bounce back season. He got away from his game too much last season and tried to be a mobile puck mover and he’s not that at all. One thing I do like is that I think he makes a good pair with any other D, he fits in nicely anywhere.

I’m still not sold on the Bruins being as deep as the ocean on the blue line though. Those guys in Providence are not even close to NHL ready. Bartkowski maybe but I wouldn’t want him to play more than 5 minutes a game, but the rest of the lot need a good 3 years if they develop at all. I hope Hamilton pans out, from what I saw of him he didn’t look like a first round pick.

by MattS on Oct 3, 2011 1:59 PM EDT reply actions  

I think once Kampfer gets healthy, they go 8 deep on the blue line without issue. We’ll see growth from Bartkowski this year, I think.

I didn’t mean to imply for a second that we’ll see Hamilton this year; I was just pointing out some of the other options, and thought I’d be negligent not to at least mention his status, that’s all. I probably should have said something about Tommy Cross, however.

by Phunwin on Oct 3, 2011 2:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

I personally have reservations with pairing our two best defensemen together. Since Chara makes everyone better, I’d like to see him paired with Corvo. Hopefully that can alleviate some of Joe’s inconsistencies, he has shown he can match Z’s minutes. We’ve seen Boychuk with Ference and that’s not always been a good thing. So the remaining pairings could be Seids and Boychuk, Ference and Quaider.
I do agree Johnny Rocket is the weak link and most likely not to be starting by season’s end.

by gravitymike on Oct 3, 2011 3:49 PM EDT reply actions  

I feel like this is the only site in Bruin-land where the evaluation of Johnny Boychuk is fair (i.e. agrees with my own).

My ideal realistic progression for the season is that Boychuk gets traded and the Bruins bring in a legit #2 guy with the cap space we have available.

My dream scenario is that somehow we bring in Ryan Suter.

by Michael Taylor on Oct 3, 2011 4:27 PM EDT reply actions  

Yea, don’t see that one happening. Nashville would be asking for a HUGE return and I don’t see PC doing that.

And that’s ignoring the financial ramifications… have a LOT of players to resign next season without adding a guy who is going to be looking for 5M+

by BobbyOrrsBastard on Oct 3, 2011 4:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m guessing he gets more like 6m, what makes me pause more is the cost to acquire, which short of Hamilton or Seguin, I’d probably be willing to pay (if we’re talking picks/prospects).

Cap wise, we’d shed Boychuk and Corvo for the upcoming offseason, and I’m guessing they’ll be able to save on some of the guys who are UFA when entry level players like Caron and Sauve are ready to jump into the lineup.

by Michael Taylor on Oct 3, 2011 7:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well right now there is ~24M in cap space for next season (counting Savvy’s 4M). Have to assume that 8M of that goes to Krejci and Rask. Take another 6 for Suter and that only leaves 10M for another 7 roster spots. Not great options.

by BobbyOrrsBastard on Oct 3, 2011 7:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

But when you consider the top 6 F, both goalies, and the top 4 (or so) D would be already signed, I wouldn’t figure more than $1m for those spots to begin with.

by Michael Taylor on Oct 3, 2011 8:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

With the Bruins’ farm system depth, though, a lot of those bottom 6 F spots can be filled quite cheaply; guys like Spooner and Knight should be ready for spoked B jerseys by then. Factor in an increase in the cap of a couple million, and it’s definitely possible, albeit improbable.

I’m more concerned with the year after, when Lucic, Seguin and Horton will be looking for new contracts.

by Phunwin on Oct 3, 2011 8:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Lucic, Seguin, Horton, and Marchand, but on the bright side, Ference comes off the cap, and you’d have to figure two years from now, Thomas won’t get 5m (especially if they’re paying Rask 3m).

by Michael Taylor on Oct 3, 2011 8:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t expect Thomas to be playing in two years honestly.

by BobbyOrrsBastard on Oct 3, 2011 8:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

curious how much you’re thinking to Krejci and Rask.

I don’t see Rask getting less than Niemi or Halak money, somewhere around 3.5. Krejci I’d take a wild stab that they won’t be able to keep Bergy as the top paid forward anymore. 5.5 maybe?

by TomServo42 on Oct 3, 2011 8:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

My guess was 5 and 3 so we are certainly in the same ballpark.

by BobbyOrrsBastard on Oct 3, 2011 8:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

somehow we bring in Ryan Suter.

Great, now I’ve gotta change my pants.

Your 2011 Stanley Cup Champion Boston Bruins
Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Playoffs in Pictures: Round 1 Game 1+2 Habs @ Bruins (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Oct 3, 2011 4:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

My dream scenario is that somehow we bring in Ryan Suter Shea Weber.

FTFY.

I can't seriously be asked to summarize my sports fandom in a short blurb for all to see, can I?

by Johnny Appleseed on Oct 4, 2011 4:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

Six of one, half dozen of another. Weber got the credit, but Suter was actually just a smidge better by statistical metrics. Nashville can’t afford both of them and Pekka Rinne, so one will be leaving town. And since Suter is unrestricted, and Weber is restricted, Suter’s more likely to leave.

by Phunwin on Oct 4, 2011 8:37 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

if Wisniewski got 5.5 as a UFA and Campbell’s albatross contract was actually movable this offseason, Suter is going to command (even more) absurd money. Aside from maybe mid-season rental, I’m writing this one off as a pipedream for Bruins fans.

by TomServo42 on Oct 4, 2011 8:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

It’s unlikely, to be sure. But Boston does have cap room, and there aren’t too many contracts that you’d say “oh God, what is that thing?!?” save Savard’s deal and that isn’t going to count against the cap.

If the cap goes up $2M after this year (which is pretty conservative; the cap went up almost $5M this offseason and NHL revenues are on the rise…thanks in no small part to the recent dominance of large-market American teams), the Bruins have $22M in room. Plus Savard’s $4M, that’s $26 million. If Rask gets $3M and Krejci $5M, that’s $18M in room. If Suter gets $7M, you’ve got $11M in room for 7 spots, with all top 4 D, top 6 F and goaltending slots filled.

It’s unlikely, but it absolutely can be done, especially if they offload Ference’s $2.25M deal, or if we get another big cap bump like this offseason.

by Phunwin on Oct 4, 2011 9:00 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

So you’re saying there’s a chance?

Your 2011 Stanley Cup Champion Boston Bruins
Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Playoffs in Pictures: Round 1 Game 1+2 Habs @ Bruins (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Oct 4, 2011 10:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

Sure, although I have a feeling when he signs a 7.5m contract somewhere other than Boston in the offseason we’ll be saying, What was all that one in a million talk.

I am curious though as to who in the offseason will have 1. The desire (although you could argue almost any team would want an elite defenseman, 2. The cap room. 3. The ability to spend to the cap. 4. The ability to contend/desirable location.

by Michael Taylor on Oct 4, 2011 10:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

boston, boston, boston, boston

Your 2011 Stanley Cup Champion Boston Bruins
Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Playoffs in Pictures: Round 1 Game 1+2 Habs @ Bruins (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Oct 4, 2011 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

I was going to say the Detroit until the second half of #4

by TomServo42 on Oct 4, 2011 10:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

There are very nice suburbs of Detroit where all the players live. I don’t think they have armed guards, but it’s a matter of time.

Your 2011 Stanley Cup Champion Boston Bruins
Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Playoffs in Pictures: Round 1 Game 1+2 Habs @ Bruins (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Oct 4, 2011 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

PUNCH ALL THE WHALES!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Durling_headshot_small
NHL Playoffs 2012: Western Conference Finals Game Three Open Thread
Small
Dougie Hamilton OHL Jersey
Looch-t_cap_small
LA Kings - 2012 Stanley Cup Champions?
Durling_headshot_small
Belated USA-Canada IIHF Open Thread
Axe_small
Wishlist!
Milt_schmidt_small
The All-Boston Team: Summer Project
Small
Chance to win a Bruins Prize pack, anyone else have a few minutes for a university project?!
246904_10150207466208058_559893057_6815629_7738165_n_small
He said she said trade rumor thread
Small
NHL Playoff Format
Small
Thanks Chowder

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor

Thomas_small sarahconnors

Durling_headshot_small Ryan Durling

Editors

B75ed5811b_bradmarchand_09262006_small Phunwin

Me_small xokathryn

5531_630546183341_11011139_37429402_2472201_n_small Biz Jacobs

Doug_roma_small dwatson783

Authors

Small Scott Frano

Resized_small Kristian Limas

Profile_pic_small PeterMacKellar

427799_10150607786667127_578457126_9253226_1796777750_n_small Dave Carignan

Boooyyyccchhuuukkk_small Shelby Lefebvre