Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: UEFA Champions League 2012: Chelsea Wins on Penalties

Northeast Division Preview

The Northeast Division can be divided into three categories: Stanley Cup contenders, fringe playoff contenders, and the Ottawa Senators.  A division that has been dominated in recent years by the Bruins and Sabres figures to be a battle between the division's two American teams once again.  So, which one will come out on top, the defending Stanley Cup champions or the upstarts who spent lavishly to improve in the offseason?

Star-divide

1. Boston Bruins (projected points: 107)

I'll keep this brief, since we've got plenty of Bruin season preview content coming, but the Bruins arguably underperformed in the regular season last year; their goal differential was worthy of a better record.  While Tim Thomas is sure to regress this year, the Bruins have plenty of players who should improve and fill the gap.  I look for improvement from the defense as a group (much of it coming from a full year of an older and wiser Adam McQuaid), and Tuukka Rask as well, which will hopefully keep the Bruins goals against steady.  I also expect further improvement up front from Tyler Seguin, Brad Marchand, Milan Lucic and David Krejci, and probably a bounceback year from Rich Peverley as well. All in all, the champs are well poised for their third division crown in four years.

2. Buffalo Sabres (projected points: 103)

It's hard to overstate the rotten luck that Buffalo had last season.  A number of important contributors missed significant time, led by Derek Roy, who was limited to 35 games.  Franchise defenseman Tyler Myers got off to a horrible start before finding his way in the second half.  Combine that with a step backward from Ryan Miller and it's impressive that they even managed 96 points.  The fact is, Buffalo had a torrid second half, and probably would have beaten Philadelphia in round 1 of the playoffs had the injury bug not stung them once again.  Like Boston, Buffalo features a fairly young core of players that should show improvement. 

The Sabres spent lavishly in the offseason, bringing in Christian Ehrhoff, Ville Leino and Robyn Regehr.  This will shore up a defense that was lacking behind Myers and the surprisingly good Jordan Leopold last year, though the loss of the underrated Steve Montador means the upgrade will not be quite as significant.  Ehrhoff benefited mightily from playing with the star-laden Canucks last year, and will not put up the numbers Sabres fans might expect, but he remains a top-notch power play quarterback.  Regehr is a thumper, who adds some muscle to the blue line, and will help keep the shots against down.  Putting him on the first pair with the 6'8 Myers would give Buffalo's big man more ability to display his offensive talent.  The Leino signing didn't impress me as much; that looks like one they may regret, as Leino benefited mightily from great teammates and soft matchups in Philly.  Still, the Sabres will roll two quality scoring lines, and maybe three.  Miller is, of course, a rock in goal, though Sabre fans probably need to realize that his magnificent 2009-10 season was the anomaly, and not the very good, but not great, one that followed.  All in all, the Sabres have a fair chance to take back the Northeast Division for the third time in six years.

3. Montreal Canadiens (projected points: 95)

Les Habitantes pushed the eventual champs to overtime of the 7th game of the opening round before this happened.  (And if you think that intro was just an excuse to link to that video, then you know me too well.)  So why do I have them well behind the Bruins and Sabres?  I just don't see how this team will score goals, particularly at even strength.  Only 6 teams lit the lamp fewer times than the Habs last season, though there should be some improvement.  The addition of 26 goal scorer Erik Cole should help, as will a healthy Max Pacioretty, and Scott Gomez can't possibly repeat the sort of lousy puck luck that led to a 4.5% shooting percentage.  Even so, number 1 center Tomas Plekanac is a poor man's Patrice Bergeron, and Mike Cammalleri is a power play sniper who brings little to the table 5 on 5 and increasingly looks like he simply cashed in on a contract year. 

But even a slight increase in scoring will probably be offset at the other end.  "But wait, Andrei Markov is back!"  Yes, Markov is healthy, at least as of the time of this article and 82 games of Markov would give Montreal a boost.  But Markov is entering his 12th season and has played over 70 games exactly four times; we might see the second coming of Christ before we see Markov play a full season again.  What's more, the Canadiens picked up James Wisniewski to replace Markov, and Wisniewski gave them 43 games of sublime play.  43 games of Wisniewski and 7 games of Markov isn't that different, production-wise, than the 50-60 games we can reasonably expect Markov to play.  PK Subban will continue to improve, especially if the coaching staff gets him to concentrate more on his prodigious skills than being an agitator, and a healthy Josh Gorges won't hurt, either.  But the steady Roman Hamrlik is gone, and Jaroslav Spacek and Hal Gill are just about ready for the glue factory.  And then, there's Carey Price.  Price was magnificent last year, and nearly stole the first round series on his own.  But he also played 72 games, a number the Habs probably should limit a bit, and set a career high for save percentage.  Any regression at all from Price would be disastrous.  Once again, the season rides squarely on his shoulders; I'm not sure he's going to be able to carry this team to the playoffs once again, but if he does, all things are possible.

4. Toronto Maple Leafs (projected points: 93)

With the price tag paid in full on the Phil Kessel trade, Bruins fans can stop cheering against the Maple Leafs and go back to not giving a damn about them.  This team is not unlike Montreal in a lot of ways, though they are a bit younger, and should show some overall improvement.  Like the Habs, it's hard to tell where the goal scoring will come from.  Toronto scored a meager 218 goals last year, just 2 more than Montreal, and it's questionable whether they'll score even that many again.  The Leafs enjoyed surprisingly good seasons from Nikolai Kulemin, Mikhail Grabovski and Clarke MacArthur.  MacArthur's offensive explosion was truly out of nowhere, and Kulemin's 17.9% shooting percentage is probably unsustainable, so at least two of those players figure to decline.  Like Montreal, the Leafs figure to pin their offensive fortunes on talented, but oft-injured players: Matthew Lombardi and Tim Connolly.  The Leafs hope that at least one of them can provide Phil Kessel with the service he's missed since leaving Marc Savard's wing. The bottom two lines contain little to no offensive talent unless someone (maybe Joe Colborne) has a breakout season.

Defensively, the Leafs are in better shape.  Luke Schenn is on the verge of becoming a top-tier defenseman, and Carl Gunnarsson is extremely underrated.  Dion Phaneuf is overrated, but still a quality player, and the additions of Cody Franson and John-Michael Liles give them a perfectly respectable set of defensemen.  And if either Keith Aulie or Jake Gardiner can make the leap and shuffle the dreadful Mike Komisarek to the press box, so much the better.  The Leafs will improve in goal, as well, as they'll get around 60 games of James Reimer, as opposed to what they had last year: 37 games of Reimer and 45 games of crap.  A slight regression for "Optimus Reim" might be in the cards, but he's still better in goal than anyone this franchise has had since Curtis Joseph.  If the KGM line is for real, and Connolly and Lombardi stay healthy, this team should make the playoffs.  But, that's a pretty rosy scenario, and falling just short of the 8th spot is probably more likely.

5. Ottawa Senators (68 points)

The Senators management couldn't be bothered to spend much time on this season, so why should I?  The fact is, this franchise is in a long-overdue rebuilding mode.  The 2006-7 season was the high water mark, and they kept clinging to the illusion that they were just a player or two away from getting back there.  When the roof finally caved in last season, as Daniel Alfredsson, Sergei Gonchar and Alexei Kovalev all got old at the same time, the rebuild began.  The Senators have some building blocks in Mika Zibanejad, David Rundblad and Erik Karlsson.  And Nikita Filatov will get every opportunity to showcase his prodigious skills, and may be the player he never could be in Columbus.  It's easy to forget the Russian phenom is still just 21.  As for the defense, there's bad, there's really bad, there's crime scene bad, and then there's the Senators.  Their (ahem) shutdown defenseman, Chris Phillips, managed a -35 last year.  And good news, he signed a contract extension in the offseason!  Somehow, Filip Kuba is even worse.  Rundblad and Karlsson will be fine players in time, but they will suffer through trial by fire this year.

The top line of Alfredsson, Jason Spezza and either Milan Michalek, Bobby Butler or Filatov will be productive if Alfredsson stays healthy, and Craig Anderson is a good enough goaltender to steal a few games here and there.  But between an offense with zero depth, and that defense, it would be nothing short of stunning if this team finishes anywhere but the Northeast Division basement, and probably the Eastern Conference basement, for that matter.

Poll
Who's going to win the Northeast Division?
Boston
184 votes
Buffalo
116 votes
Montreal
28 votes
Ottawa
15 votes
Toronto
7 votes

350 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 41 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I would say the Canadiens have been more prevalent in the NE than Buffalo has in recent years.

Buffalo – 4th, 3rd, 1st, 3rd – two playoffs, 0 series wins
Boston – 3rd, 1st, 3rd, 1st – four playoffs, 6 series wins
Montreal – 1st, 2nd, 4th, 2nd – four playoffs, 3 series wins

by BobbyOrrsBastard on Oct 4, 2011 12:05 PM EDT reply actions  

Nice job cutting your sample size to 4 years, and thus ignoring Buffalo’s 2006-7 division championship (and conference final) and their 2005-6 second place finish (and conference final). That 2005-6 Buffalo team probably should have won the Cup.

I stand by my statement.

by Phunwin on Oct 4, 2011 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

4 seemed reasonable for ‘recent’ years.

Any farther back and Boston gets booted from consideration thanks to their last-place finishes.

So if Boston is included it has to be for the 4 year span… if a bigger scope is used then it is Montreal and Buffalo claiming that title.

by BobbyOrrsBastard on Oct 4, 2011 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

In the last 6 years, Boston has won a Cup and two division titles, while Buffalo has two division titles and two conference final appearances. It seems pretty straightforward to me to say that they’ve dominated the division.

Plus it made a handy lead in for the article. Sue me.

by Phunwin on Oct 4, 2011 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’ll grant you the handy lead in bit… but you can see where I am coming from as well.

Just seems to me that Montreal has had a better claim on divisional power than Montreal based on playoff appearances and results. Were it not for the hype surrounding Buffalo thanks to Pegula (the bastid!) I don’t see them being viewed in the same light.

by BobbyOrrsBastard on Oct 4, 2011 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

I still don’t buy the Buffalo hype… just don’t see them improving all that much. My finish is:

Boston – 105
Montreal – 98
Buffalo – 96
Toronto – 90
Ottawa – crap

by BobbyOrrsBastard on Oct 4, 2011 12:08 PM EDT reply actions  

I think that Buffalo would be on track to improve even if they hadn’t picked up Ehrhoff and Regehr and (okay, fine) Leino. That’s a pretty young team, and Tyler Myers’ improvement alone is worth a point or two in the standings.

I do worry about Drew Stafford, though. Seems like that might have been a bit of a contract year push. Of course, if he played all his games against the Bruins, he would have been paid like Brad Richards.

by Phunwin on Oct 4, 2011 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m just not sold on the improvements. There is no one on that team that truly scares me other than Vanek.

by BobbyOrrsBastard on Oct 4, 2011 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

Myers and Regehr is going to be scary good. 9th ranked powerplay with the addition of Ehrhoff will certainly help their cause. If they don’t get hit by injuries they should hit 100 points, maybe more.

by tkent on Oct 4, 2011 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

The power play will lose some with the loss of Connolly, who was an excellent power play producer, though a healthy Derek Roy will alleviate some of that. But yeah, that’s going to be a good power play.

by Phunwin on Oct 4, 2011 6:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

I heard Myers grew another inch

Your 2011 Stanley Cup Champion Boston Bruins
Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Playoffs in Pictures: Round 1 Game 1+2 Habs @ Bruins (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Oct 4, 2011 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not sure how it is hype...

With the amount of games lost to injury last season a somewhat healthy season by Buffalo’s top players would be enough for some improvement. I think adding the defencemen they did makes them scarier then others are thinking. Ryan Miller is a stud goalie and now has a very competent and deep defence corps in front of him. I think Buffalo and Boston fight to the bitter end for the regular season division crown.

They did it for Savy, they did it for Horton, they did it for each other, they did it for us. I give you the 2011 Stanley Cup Champions....The Boston Bruins!!

by beachguy113 on Oct 5, 2011 8:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

Right with you on order, except I have Buffalo and Boston flipped. I think the Sabres will be the better regular season team this season, while my thought is the Bruins will be better positioned once the playoffs roll around.

All bets are off regarding Seguin and Rask though. If Tuukka returns to form mitigating Thomas’ impending regression (and I don’t at all mean that as a slight, it’s almost impossible to progress from where he was last season) and if Seguin makes the jump this team could be special.

I do worry about the defense though. Corvo hasn’t played in this system, and the other 5 guys logged a ton of minutes last spring. I put the chances of Ference being healthy for 82 about the same as my ordering a Ryan Suter home jersey minutes after the trade deadline.

by Michael Taylor on Oct 4, 2011 12:11 PM EDT reply actions  

82 would be a stretch for Ference no matter what. That hasn’t happened since 05-06! Better question is what odds do you give of him making 70 games?

by BobbyOrrsBastard on Oct 4, 2011 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Better than Andrei Markov’s.

by Phunwin on Oct 4, 2011 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wanna bet?

Your 2011 Stanley Cup Champion Boston Bruins
Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Playoffs in Pictures: Round 1 Game 1+2 Habs @ Bruins (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Oct 4, 2011 2:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Why not? I’m 1-0 betting on Ference.

by Phunwin on Oct 4, 2011 6:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m not sure you’re wrong. Boston is better equipped to succeed in the playoffs. I just couldn’t quite put Buffalo first, though I think they will be very good, and probably the best non-division champ in the East.

by Phunwin on Oct 4, 2011 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

For me some combination of Washington, Pittsburgh, Boston, and Buffalo are the top 4. I can easily envision a scenario where the Caps and Slugs are 1, 2 at the end of the regular season, but Boston and Pittsburgh are the last two standing in the ECF.

From a Bruins fan standpoint, while you always want them to play well, having someone to chase come the trade deadline might serve them well. Sometimes it’s easy to think you’ve done enough, and when spring rolls around you realize you haven’t, and it’s too late.

by Michael Taylor on Oct 4, 2011 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

That’s exactly who I think the top 4 will be, but I think Washington breaks through this year.

by Phunwin on Oct 4, 2011 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Speaking of trade deadline and defense…I think Boston has the right situation cap wise to bring in someone on defense if we get hit with injuries or if things just aren’t going well.

by tkent on Oct 4, 2011 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

We’ve been pipe-dreaming/having wet dreams about Ryan Suter coming to Boston. A wet pipe dream? Yes, let’s go with that.

by Phunwin on Oct 4, 2011 7:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

I was going to disagree with your Ottawa preview

… but really, I can’t. I do think the Sens will finish with more than 68 points this year, but your description of the three vets on the blue line was pretty bang-on. We’re all just hoping for an age-defying rebound year from Phillips, Alfredsson, and Gonchar.

by Peter Raaymakers on Oct 4, 2011 4:08 PM EDT reply actions  

If I’m honest, I’m kind of spitballing with those point totals. But anything over 70 would surprise me.

by Phunwin on Oct 4, 2011 7:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't buy the Leafs

I don’t see much improvement on the Leafs. Even in goal, I wouldn’t be surprised to actually see them decline.

Yes, they have Reimer now, but they’ve also lost Giguere which means potentially more starts for Gustavsson as well.

Last year, their save percentage was .907.

Let’s say Gustavsson gets 1/4 of their starts and repeats the .890 that he’s done ever since he came over. Then if Reimer plays 3/4 of the games and puts up a .913, the Leafs are right back where they were at .907.

That .913 is right in-line with guys like: Bobrovsky, Neuvirth, Lehtonen, Roloson, Pavelec, Halak, and others put up there. Toss in an injury somewhere (Gustavsson has had the bug) and you’ve got to go deeper in their system and I wouldn’t be surprised to see the team with a lower save percentage.

I expect them to still end up 4th in the division, but I’m thinking closer to mid-80s in points, just like last year).

by Bourque77 on Oct 4, 2011 8:33 PM EDT reply actions  

I think that Gustavsson will improve on that .890. I mean, that’s below replacement level. He’s still young, and was pretty well regarded in Sweden.

I also think the defense will get better, and reduce the number of shots on net. Luke Schenn’s improvement will be worth quite a bit there, without anything else.

by Phunwin on Oct 4, 2011 8:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Everything that makes one expect improvement from Gustavsson is something that leads to expecting a significant drop-off from Reimer.

Gustavsson’s 1,800 shots in the NHL aren’t enough to demonstrate his skill? Then Reimer’s 1,100 likely aren’t as well.

Gustavsson’s highly regarded play in Sweden leads to optimism? Then Reimer’s lack of regard until playing in the NHL last season probably indicates he’s due for a fall back.

I’d also question that Gustavsson is young – he’s 27 in a few weeks (typically past peak age for goalies, granted there are exceptions). Similarly, I’d question how highly regarded he was – he was undrafted and is looking a lot more like someone who had one great year (his only year as a starter in the SEL) that people wanted to see if it could be repeated rather than someone who was really a highly regarded prospect people had been following for years.

The replacement level aspect doesn’t even work in his defense – by all accounts, the Leafs would send him down if that didn’t mean they’d lose the option to recall him. He’d be subjected to recallable waivers and, this being the last year of his NHL contract, it also means this may be their last chance to see him in the NHL.

by Bourque77 on Oct 4, 2011 9:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

.890 isn’t just bad, that’s Vesa Toskala bad. He was .902 the year before, .898 for his career. It is almost unthinkable to believe that he has not bottomed out. I would be stunned if Gustavsson lets 11% of opposing shots score again.

by Phunwin on Oct 4, 2011 10:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m aware of how bad it is. I’m also aware that Gustavsson has one season in his life that has indicated he may have the talent to play in the NHL – and that was two years ago in Sweden. There is no evidence that Gustavsson is even a replacement level goalie at all.

Similarly, for the Leafs, the offseason improvements to their personnel ignore the in-season losses to their personnel. Schenn may improve – but enough to make up for the loss of Beauchemin? Connolly may help the team, but enough to make up for the loss of Versteeg?

Overall, I don’t see the Leafs as any different than last year. The pieces have changed, but I expect the results to be similar at almost every part of their game.

by Bourque77 on Oct 5, 2011 9:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

Agree to disagree. I’m only going to spend so much effort defending a lousy goaltender for a second-tier team.

by Phunwin on Oct 5, 2011 5:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ahhh … perspective. Good thing that at least one of us (you) has it.

by Bourque77 on Oct 5, 2011 6:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

I am inclined to agree with you...

I cant remember where I read this but they had a team shooting percentage of like 14% over the last third of the season when they went on their run and I am not totally sold on Reimer yet. Its one thing to come in and play out of your mind for a team so far out of it that when you make a huge run you still miss out by 6 or 8 points. The Leafs will score a few more goals if they stay healthy but I think a regression for James Reimer is iminent. Combine his come out of nowhere goaltending with their high shooting percentage and you get a nice run for 35 games. I think if there is anyone out there that is in the snipers eye for a sophmore slump its Reimer. Lets see what happens when Reimer has a few bad games to start the season and the media and fans jump all over him for dashing their parade dreams in October.

They did it for Savy, they did it for Horton, they did it for each other, they did it for us. I give you the 2011 Stanley Cup Champions....The Boston Bruins!!

by beachguy113 on Oct 5, 2011 8:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

If Reimer was a Blaine Lacher/Steve Mason type of one year wonder, then yes, Toronto is cooked. That much is certain. I don’t think he is; he posted a .925 save percentage in the AHL at age 22 and was at .920 when he was called up last year. So I think he’s for real.

But goaltenders are unpredictable, and there is no disputing the notion that Toronto cannot afford any regression at all from Reimer and still have a shot at the playoffs. Jonas Gustavsson is, at best, replacement level, and they don’t have anyone else who can help.

by Phunwin on Oct 5, 2011 8:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

That is my biggest concern in viewing the Leafs from last year. I do agree that they will be better as they have added some depth but it all depends on health from their new additions up front. I just dont think they score at the rate they did last year.

I should have clarified that I agree that Reimer will be the tender of the future but for some reason I just see him having a tough ride this year. For his sake I hope he has a great year because he is one of those players you cant help but like. Kid just has a great attitude. I just hope that the Leaf faithful isnt too hard on him if he has a few rough patches.

They did it for Savy, they did it for Horton, they did it for each other, they did it for us. I give you the 2011 Stanley Cup Champions....The Boston Bruins!!

by beachguy113 on Oct 5, 2011 9:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

as to no one else who can help, they also have Ben Scrivens who has posted roughly the same save % in the AHL you site in support of Reimer – .924. Yeah, i think they’re risking it, banking on guys with so little experience, but they do have strong prospects.

by TomServo42 on Oct 5, 2011 10:00 AM EDT up reply actions  

if miller plays likes his vezina year

buffalo could win the divison but really i think they would fizzle in the playoffs. this boston team wont

bergy for selke.
retire #16!

by muffinman2 on Oct 5, 2011 12:44 AM EDT reply actions  

Buffalo wasn’t built to succeed in the playoffs last year, but the improvements they’ve made should make them stronger. Heck, simple good health would have put them in round 2 last season.

by Phunwin on Oct 5, 2011 8:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

id be intrested to see how sabres GAA turns out

they have a superstar goalie and a capable backup, but its their d that improved

bergy for selke.
retire #16!

by muffinman2 on Oct 5, 2011 4:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Montreal Sucks, Subban Swallows

by Bruin for a win on Oct 5, 2011 1:50 AM EDT reply actions  

well...

that pretty much sums it up.

by snowboard_kat on Oct 5, 2011 7:45 AM EDT up reply actions  

All in all great preview Phunwin. I think your analysis of the division is bang on. I dont see too much of a shift throughout the season but injuries can always have something to say about that.

Is it friggin Thursday yet?? I know it was mid June when the party ended but god damn I miss me some hockey!! I dont count my 3 nights a week of beer league hockey as enough!!

They did it for Savy, they did it for Horton, they did it for each other, they did it for us. I give you the 2011 Stanley Cup Champions....The Boston Bruins!!

by beachguy113 on Oct 5, 2011 9:09 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

PUNCH ALL THE WHALES!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Durling_headshot_small
NHL Playoffs 2012: Western Conference Finals Game Three Open Thread
Small
Dougie Hamilton OHL Jersey
Looch-t_cap_small
LA Kings - 2012 Stanley Cup Champions?
Durling_headshot_small
Belated USA-Canada IIHF Open Thread
Axe_small
Wishlist!
Milt_schmidt_small
The All-Boston Team: Summer Project
Small
Chance to win a Bruins Prize pack, anyone else have a few minutes for a university project?!
246904_10150207466208058_559893057_6815629_7738165_n_small
He said she said trade rumor thread
Small
NHL Playoff Format
Small
Thanks Chowder

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor

Thomas_small sarahconnors

Durling_headshot_small Ryan Durling

Editors

B75ed5811b_bradmarchand_09262006_small Phunwin

Me_small xokathryn

5531_630546183341_11011139_37429402_2472201_n_small Biz Jacobs

Doug_roma_small dwatson783

Authors

Small Scott Frano

Resized_small Kristian Limas

Profile_pic_small PeterMacKellar

427799_10150607786667127_578457126_9253226_1796777750_n_small Dave Carignan

Boooyyyccchhuuukkk_small Shelby Lefebvre