Bruins acquire Chris Kelly in trade with Ottawa
The night started with wild speculation around the Hub of Hockey that the Bruins were working on a deal with the Toronto Maple Leafs to bring in puck-moving defenseman Tomas Kaberle, but at the end of the night it would be Chris Kelly from the Ottawa Senators that would be making the move to Boston. The Bruins announced on Tuesday night that they have added center Chris Kelly in a trade with the Senators. The Bruins sent their own 2011 second round pick up north to Ottawa in this deal in exchange for the 30-year old forward.
Kelly is considered to be a two-way forward, who has the ability to play both center and left wing. Kelly has 23 points (12-11-23) in 57 games for Ottawa this season.
Kelly currently makes $2 million ($2.125 million cap hit) and has one year left on his contract after this season.
Obviously, this isn't the big blockbuster deal that Bruins fans were hoping for, but it is depth move that improves the team without making a major subtraction. The biggest upside of this deal is Kelly's ability on the penalty kill, something that the Bruins have struggled with lately.
35 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Hell of a good bottom-six forward
If you guys go far in the playoffs, Kelly will be incredibly valuable. Enjoy watching him!
An Ottawa Senators fan blogging at www.silversevensens.com
by Peter Raaymakers on Feb 16, 2011 12:04 AM EST reply actions
Oh yay another $2 million dollar plugger. Exactly what we need..
Unbelievable. Looks like another 2 and out in the playoffs. If we even get to round 2.
Well...
this 2 million dollar plugger will be 2wice as good as our 4 million dollar Wheeler. Kelly does add some depth, and he is a reliable player for 2 mil. Probably this trade is to cover a hole that is about to be dug for another trade. But taking it just as it is, it doesn’t seem like much.
Solid addition but hoping as well that this trade will forecast another near trade in the future.
by BSturgeon on Feb 16, 2011 1:04 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Wheeler’s cap hit is 2.2 million.
http://capgeek.com/charts.php?Team=5
Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Year in Review: Your 2010 Boston Bruins. The Good, the Bad, the Loss to Philly (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Feb 16, 2011 1:10 AM EST up reply actions
I don’t think it’d surprise to anyone if Wheeler is dealt to the Leafs in a Kaberle deal (which would make this deal make alot of sense IMO).
by BSturgeon on Feb 16, 2011 1:57 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
I'd prefer he be dealt for Zach Bogosian
I don’t want to keep giving Toronto good young talent – plus Karbele is much shorter term the Zach B could be.
I’d give up more to get a lot more
I’m not big on Kelly but as someone else stated, this move could mean someone else being shipped out. As of right now looks like Seguin will be the odd one out with Kelly in the lineup. Kelly should help the penalty kill though which the Bruins need badly at the moment.
The Bruins Corner http://www.bruinscorner.com
Follow me on Twitter http://twitter.com/AdamBruinsFan
by AdamBruinsFan21 on Feb 16, 2011 2:10 AM EST reply actions
I like the deal. Kelly significantly helps the penalty kill, which has been dreadful over the last couple months. And if Tyler Seguin moves to the wing, which I assume he will, Kelly improves the team on faceoffs. He should help that third line, which has been terrible defensively. When it’s some combo of Wheeler, Seguin and Ryder, you have one okay defensive player, with two hopeless ones. Put Kelly in there, though, and suddenly, it becomes a pretty solid group, to the point that you can live with Ryder’s lousy defensive play.
I do wonder where they put Seguin now. I sort of hate to see him playing 4th line, but I’m not sure there’s another choice, unless Wheeler or Ryder is traded as part of a bigger deal. On the plus side, the 4th line has shown some offensive production this year, and some of their grit might rub off on the youngster.
Oh, and at this point, I’m pretty sure you can close the book on the Brad Richards speculation (ignoring his minor injury). The Bruins just added yet more depth at C, and now have $51.7M in salary committed for next year. No way they can trade for and re-sign Richards unless significant long-term salary is going back to Dallas.
I like this trade
Good addition, I agree that we are now open to move someone like Wheeler, so long as we don’t give the Leafs back their pick!!!!
All this buttoning and unbuttoning
“Are you saying ‘am I going to hit a grand slam in the next deal if I can do a next deal?’ I don’t think so. I think it’ll be a good deal. There are good players out there and I hope I can get it done." – Peter Chiarelli
Something about this quote doesn’t inspire much confidence… “If I can do a next deal?” I know this isn’t videogame hockey and nothing is easy in wheeling and dealing, but sounds like he’s setting the bar low. I’m being a debbie downer following this Kelly trade, but I’m gettng a little sick of Chiarelli’s conservative approach while teams like Chicago (last year) and Philly (this year) are stockpiling to win cups.
Chiarelli just doesn’t show his hand, ever. I’m okay with that especially considering the example of the opposite up in Toronto.
Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Year in Review: Your 2010 Boston Bruins. The Good, the Bad, the Loss to Philly (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Feb 16, 2011 9:29 AM EST up reply actions
just frustrating to hear, especially with the past couple years being repeat “we were in on some guys we didn’t land”
Eh, Chiarelli’s got the team right up against the cap. Some of that is less-than-super contracts but Peter’s got quite the balancing act to do there. If they don’t grab the big name on trade deadline day, I’m not crying over it.
Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Year in Review: Your 2010 Boston Bruins. The Good, the Bad, the Loss to Philly (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Feb 16, 2011 9:50 AM EST up reply actions
Two points here, as I rise to Chiarelli’s defense:
1. The guy does not like to talk things up. He just doesn’t. I’m okay with that. He’s shown an ability to make big moves when the need arises. He doesn’t want to get skewered in the Boston press for talking big and then not delivering. Now, that said, Cam Neely (his boss) said a deal was close. So, obviously, Neely is looking to put some pressure on PC to get a deal done.
2. I think history has vindicated PC for his 2010 deadline moves. I think he knew the Bruins weren’t that great a team, and were not one move away from a Cup run. So, he made some minor moves, all of which worked out quite well. Yes, you can make the argument that the Bruins were one goal away from the conference finals. Fine and well. But the fact is, that team was dangerously flawed. The miracle wasn’t that Philly came back from being down 3-0, it was that the Bruins were up 3-0 in the first place. Mortgaging the future for that team would have proven a mistake. I have no idea how close the rumored Simon Gagne/Tim Thomas trade was, but it seems safe to say that it would have been a mistake to pull the trigger on that.
Didn’t he say “a deal was close” right before the Chris Kelly deal? Was there any indication he wasn’t talking about Chris Kelly?
Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Year in Review: Your 2010 Boston Bruins. The Good, the Bad, the Loss to Philly (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Feb 16, 2011 10:49 AM EST up reply actions
I think that’s only because it was in the articles about Kaberle speculation that were all over the place yesterday. From the Joe MacDonald article on ESPN:
Bruins president Cam Neely went on the station later Tuesday and acknowledged that the Bruins were “close” to completing a trade but he would not give specifics.But it doesn’t mention anything about being close to completing a trade with Toronto specifically.
- Basically Burke says “We’re talking with Boston”
- Neely says “The Bruins are close to a deal” but not which team it’s with
- Everyone assume’s Kaberle will be stripping off blue and white and putting on black and gold during the first intermission.
At least that’s how I see it in a post-Kelly-trade world.
Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Year in Review: Your 2010 Boston Bruins. The Good, the Bad, the Loss to Philly (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Feb 16, 2011 12:14 PM EST up reply actions
The forecast for this parade is: RAIN
Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Year in Review: Your 2010 Boston Bruins. The Good, the Bad, the Loss to Philly (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Feb 16, 2011 2:46 PM EST up reply actions
Let’s get a clutch scorer not named Chris Drury.
Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Year in Review: Your 2010 Boston Bruins. The Good, the Bad, the Loss to Philly (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Feb 16, 2011 9:32 AM EST reply actions
Or an NHL defense. Work with me here.
Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Year in Review: Your 2010 Boston Bruins. The Good, the Bad, the Loss to Philly (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Feb 16, 2011 9:48 AM EST up reply actions
Bogosian work for you?
If they are going to give up pieces for a defensemen, I’d prefer a 25 yo vs 32 yo.
Plus he’d actually be worth giving up the Toronto 1st
Bogosian would work…as a second pickup. The kid has talent, but he has sucked this year, and needs further development. He will not help the team significantly this season. I would have no qualms about giving up the Toronto pick for him, because he’s got talent to spare, but I would do so only with the understanding that he has to be eased into a top 4 role.
If it required giving up the Leafs 1st rounder for Bogosian; I’d rather take Kaberle as he most likely would not require giving up that first rounder. Obviously, I would rather have Bogosian for the long haul but for this year and making the playoff push, give me the veteran defenseman to provide a more immediate significant impact.
DO NOT WANT.
seriously though….i don’t think this move was necessary. sure, he’ll help out our PK and stuff but i’m pretty sure we can all agree we’d rather have a puck moving defenseman.
also, i don’t get why people are even uttering names like Rick Nash. how the hell would we fit a player like that under the cap? 7.5 mil isn’t very easy to clear up. but if i could, i’d trade
david krejci, 2 first rounders, my left nut
for
rick nash.
but again….cap space. i also heard jon wallach saying how it would leave us empty at center (which is true). he said something like “all we’d have is bergeron campbell and kelly”. why has nobody considered giving Wheeler more time at center? i thought he played much better at the position……whatever

by 
























