Are the Bruins Done Dealing?
With the acquisition of Tomas Kaberle, as well as Chris Kelly, Rich Peverley and Boris Valabik, it seems likely that the Bruins have completed their major moves in advance of the trading deadline. But, is there more to come? The first question that we have to ask is: what do the Bruins need? They've got an insane amount of depth at center, but the defense could probably still stand an upgrade, and a sniper on the wing might be welcome as well.
The Bruins don't have a ton of cap room; CapGeek says they have about $1.3 million. More room could be created by demoting Daniel Paille or Johnny Boychuk, both recent visitors to the 9th floor. With bonus penalties lingering for next year, the Bruins should be judicious about using their limited cap space, but the acquisitions of Kaberle and Peverley seem to indicate that Peter Chiarelli believes the future is now, and next year will just have to take care of itself. It's hard to argue with that approach.
"The future is now...hey, what about Brad Richards?" Forget it. Larry Brooks of the New York Post says the Stars demanded a package of Brandon Dubinsky, Marc Staal and Derek Stepan for the center. Considering age and price, I'm not sure I would trade Dubinsky for Richards straight up. One has to assume Glen Sather giggled and hung up the phone at that demand. Regardless, Richards is a guy that's almost certainly out of the Bruins' price range, if they were ever pursuing him in the first place.
Along those same lines, Ales Hemsky is on the market, and the thought of replacing Nathan Horton with him on the top line might seem inviting. However, Pierre LeBrun reported from the Heritage Classic that he spoke with a GM who phoned the Oilers and came away saying "they can keep their Ales Hemsky."
It should not be surprising that we're looking at a seller's market. After all, the Bruins paid a higher-than-expected ransom for Kaberle. But that, and the team's lack of cap space, makes it almost certain that any move would be a minor one. David Krejci, Michael Ryder and the Toronto #1 pick for Richards? Horton, Boychuk and Colby Cohen for Hemsky? Those deals would be pretty hard to imagine, even if they would work cap-wise. It's one thing to improve; it's another to take a wrecking ball to a team that's in first place in its division. A sniper, the sort they thought they were getting in Horton, would come at a premium. And anyway, Horton has shown signs of turning it around, and has also been a victim of major bad luck (name an NHL player who has hit more posts and crossbars this year). No, any move is almost certain to be minor, along the lines of a depth defenseman.
One name that has come up is Matt Hunwick. Hunwick struggled early this year, and almost all of last year, for the Bruins, and has managed to be even worse in Colorado. If Steven Kampfer has hit the rookie wall, Hunwick would be a candidate to add some mobility to the third pair. The Avalanche would surely take a bag of pucks for him, but one wonders if Hunwick is broken at this point. He's still young, but he's struggled with confidence, and playing terribly in Colorado can't help. He might be more of a reclamation project than the Bruins are interested in taking on.
It's probably just as well that any move on the blue line is likely to be strictly for depth purposes; the big names out there right now have major flaws. Sergei Gonchar's contract is awful and Filip Kuba's contract is awful, and his game is worse. Kaberle makes a Bryan McCabe or John-Michael Liles pickup moot unless the Bruins want an insanely well-paid third pair/second power play unit guy...which they might, but they certainly can't afford one. Chris Phillips would be a nice pickup, but doesn't want to leave Ottawa, which calls his mental state into question.
What about Zach Bogosian? Alas, he has been declared all but untouchable by the Thrashers. And since the Bruins and Thrashers already talked about one deal, you can assume that Chiarelli at least kicked the tires on Bogosian and found the price too high.
Shane Hnidy has been given a tryout, a point lamented previously by our fearless leader, but if that's the aisle the team is shopping in, they might also take a look at Craig Rivet, recently released by the Sabres. Rivet doesn't have much left in the tank, but he would add some toughness, experience and leadership to the blue line, which is never a bad thing.
He's not a defenseman, but a player that intrigues me, and might intrigue the Bruins, is Nikolay Zherdev. The Flyers just put Zherdev on waivers and will outright him to the AHL, presumably not to return. Yes, Zherdev is something of an enigma, but he also has 15 goals in 47 games this year, and a +7, so he can't be that bad defensively. He's 26, so he still has some upside. The Bruins were interested in signing him in the offseason, before he went to the Flyers instead. A Paille for Zherdev deal would work under the cap. Why not give Zherdev a shot at Ryder's third line right wing job? He's younger, more talented and can't possibly be worse defensively.
It's certainly possible that the Bruins will make one more big move, but it's unlikely. If I had to guess, I would say this is the team they will enter the playoffs with. And that's not necessarily a bad thing.
42 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I’m pretty sure that Paille has a one-way contract, so I doubt he will go to Providence.
As for Zherdev, I don’t think the Bruins would touch that guy. He has quickly develop a reputation as a player with zero work ethic, who just doesn’t give a shit. He is not worth the risk. No way I would trade Ryder for this guy. This story speaks volumes about Zherdev: http://www.csnphilly.com/02/23/11/Flyers-finally-cut-ties-with-Zherdev/landing_flyers_loud3r.html?blockID=416251&feedID=704
I don’t want this guy anywhere near the Bruins room.
by Stanley Cup of Chowder on Feb 24, 2011 10:00 PM EST reply actions
…and this one http://www.philly.com/philly/sports/flyers/20110224_Flyers_end_Zherdev_experiment.html
“Moody” and “aversion to defense” were both used in this article to describe him by someone who sees him play and deals with him on a daily basis.
by Stanley Cup of Chowder on Feb 24, 2011 10:08 PM EST up reply actions
So a moody forward that’s afraid to play defense? I think 2 first round picks and a second round pick would be a good price to pay for him. O wait this is Boston not Toronto.
by Noir blanc et or on Feb 25, 2011 10:41 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
So Paille goes on waivers, I don’t care. He’s not doing anything. There’s a decent chance he’d be claimed and would come off the cap just the same.
If you look at numbers, Zherdev’s supposed matador defense may be getting a bad rap. His on ice goals against/60 minutes was an impressive 1.90, good for third on the team. And his even strength on ice and off ice +/- over 60 minutes were almost dead even. (0.78 vs. 0.81)
Maybe that is in and of itself a statistical fluke, since we’ve got a small sample size, but if you look at his 2008-9 season, the Rangers were a MUCH better team with him on the ice than off it; a full 1.2 goals over 60 minutes better. And there, his defensive numbers were respectable as well, though it was more his offense that was valuable.
Columbus in 2007-8 tells a similar story; they were a better team when Zherdev was on the ice than not, though the difference was smaller (0.2 goals over 60 minutes), and a respectable goals against/60 minutes.
Zherdev is an extremely undervalued player.
I don't know enough about Zherdev to comment...
But I do agree that Paille is expendable at this point, and I wonder if we’ve seen him dress as a Bruin for the last time. There’s better things to do with that cap space, like not incur penalties next year.
Thank you Thank you Thank you!
FINALLY someone’s got the same view as I do. Now I never had the stats to back it up, but I’ve had my eye on him since that 08-09 campaign, and he is very undervalued. I’m just glad somebody finally brought that to light
And on the same end, I can’t believe the guy cleared waivers! I mean SOMEBODY must have seen his talent and thought “hey, maybe he can be a good third line contributor”. Guess I’ll never be a good NHL GM
"We didn't lose the game; we just ran out of time" - Vince Lombardi
by ilovethegbpackers on Feb 25, 2011 12:04 PM EST up reply actions
I like this team. Why can’t they compete for a cup? Only team in east I’m worried about is Philly, and the Bruins beat them twice.
Philly is still scary, but I think the Bruins are the team in the East that best match up with them, especially in terms of style.
Yeah I’ve got a pretty good feeling about this team, gotta say.
Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: The KABERLE Era has begun! (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Feb 25, 2011 11:00 AM EST up reply actions
Why can’t they compete for a cup?
Because we’re the Boston Bruins. They’ll never compete with the cup with the Jacobs in charge!
All joking aside, yeah, they’ve got a pretty good shot at it this year….even though i said that in 2001-2002…..and in 2003-2004…..and 08-09….09-10 and last year too. i guess we’ll see…
I didn’t think we had a chance last year and I was pleasantly surprised by beating Buffalo. This year? KABERLE gives me hope.
Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: The KABERLE Era has begun! (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Feb 25, 2011 11:32 AM EST up reply actions
that’s exactly why i thought we had a good shot.
we beat a red hot miller with an even hotter tuukka rask (and you know what they say about hot goalies in the playoffs); went up 3-0 against philly and was pretty confident we’d at least get to the ECF or SCF…we all know what happened after that
Honestly, I blame Rasheed Wallace
Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: The KABERLE Era has begun! (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Feb 25, 2011 11:41 AM EST up reply actions
He had the backstabbing-erity to wear a flyers hat in the locker room while playing for the Celtics…during that playoff series.
Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: The KABERLE Era has begun! (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Feb 25, 2011 11:45 AM EST up reply actions
This was the upside of the Celtics losing last year: Fuck Rasheed Wallace
Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: The KABERLE Era has begun! (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Feb 25, 2011 11:45 AM EST up reply actions
There’s really no such thing as a consistent player until you reach like Crosby or the Sedins
Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: The KABERLE Era has begun! (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Feb 25, 2011 11:00 AM EST up reply actions
Here is why they can get to the cup
The Bruins can score, that is not an opinion. They are fourth in the league in goals and first in goals allowed and have the best goalie in the league. All facts. Their PK is good. One big weakness: PP. They helped that with Kaberle, and it has already looked better.
Now to Philadelphia. Are they dangerous? yes. But after that, who? Tampa has no goaltending, do not scare me. Washington doens’t scare me as much with their situation, and maybe Montreal has a chance. Other than that, aren’t the Bruins an elite team in the east?
As for the west, are Vancouver and Detroit better? Yeah, probably. But worry about that if it happens. For now, the Bruins are one of the best teams in the east, and that is a FACT.
tomorrow's a test...
…when they take on the Canucks. If they can skate with them and keep it close, win or not, that will be a good sign to me. If they tank like they did against the Wings I’ll lose my confidence. I was at the Sharks game and it was a bit daunting to see how well they kept the B’s from making much in the offensive zone. But that was before all these recent trades so maybe it means nothing at this point.
by Professor Wagstaff on Feb 25, 2011 12:34 PM EST up reply actions
Better than Hnidy
Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: The KABERLE Era has begun! (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Feb 25, 2011 12:48 PM EST up reply actions
I don’t know, but he’s apparently in bad enough shape that a team that’s been looking for scoring forwards all year waived him.
So….return to action in a month?
Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: The KABERLE Era has begun! (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Feb 25, 2011 12:55 PM EST up reply actions
trades
i think the bruins need to grab another goalie…not a really good guy or anything…just someone to stick in the minors just incase something happens to either thomas or rask
If the B’s lose Thomas and Rask, the season is a lost cause, so what’s the point?
by Phunwin on Feb 26, 2011 10:51 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
I’d hate to see the Bruins give up on Horton. Sure, he’s not yet what we hoped for, but the team is succeeding dispite him, and if he could turn it around, we’d only get better. I vote for patience.
All this buttoning and unbuttoning
Wouldn’t trading him now be trading him at the lowest possible value?
Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: The KABERLE Era has begun! (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)
by Cornelius Hardenbergh on Feb 25, 2011 5:21 PM EST up reply actions
I was more trying to kick around what a Hemsky trade would look like than seriously advocating a Horton trade.
by Phunwin on Feb 26, 2011 10:50 AM EST via mobile up reply actions

by 























