Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Despite Relocation Drama, Coyotes Overcome Adversity

Bruins drop Game 1 to Lightning 5-2

BOSTON, MA - MAY 14:  Boston Bruins head coach Claude Julien reacts during Game One of the Eastern Conference Finals against the Tampa Bay Lightning during the 2011 NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs at TD Garden on May 14, 2011 in Boston, Massachusetts.  (Photo by Bruce Bennett/Getty Images)

The Lightning scored three goals in the span of a minute and twenty-five seconds in the first period en route to 5-2 win over the Bruins in Game 1 of the NHL Eastern Conference Finals at TD Garden.

After 11:15 of spirited, back and forth action, Sean Bergenheim took advantage of a broken stick by Dennis Seidenberg to give the Lightning a 1-0 lead. The stick-less Seidenberg kicked the puck from the slot directly to Bergenheim, who deposited the puck into the back of the net for his 8th goal of the postseason.

The Lightning increased their early lead to 2-0 just 19 seconds later when Brett Clark's soft, tough angle backhand shot from the left wing snuck in under the right arm of Tim Thomas.

A gift-wrapped turnover by Tomas Kaberle gave the Lightning their third goal in 1:25. Kaberle lost control of the puck behind the net and it squirted out to Teddy Purcell on the doorstep beofre he jammed it home for his second goal of the playoffs.

Tyler Seguin got the Bruins on the board with 4:01 left in the opening period. Michael Ryder's pass from the left wing boards in the neutral zone found Seguin just before the offensive blue line. Seguin gained the zone, split the Tampa Bay defense and got off a shot that beat Dwayne Roloson along the ice just out of reach over Rolie the Goalie's left pad. The goal was Seguin's first career playoff goal after being a helath scratch for the first two series.

With just under 8 minutes left in the third period, Johnny Boychuk laid a big open ice hit on Simon Gagne, who got caught with his head down. The clean hit by the Bruins defenseman drew the attention of Vincent Lacavalier, who cross-checked Boychuk in retaliation. Boychuk obviously did not appreciate having to deal with Lecavalier's stickwork after a legal check and returned the favor via a gloved punch to the face of Lecavalier. Boychuk was hit with a 2 minute roughing minor for the punch, while Lecavalier skated away unpunished. On the ensuing Tampa Bay power play, Marc-Andre Bergeron let a slapper fly from just inside the blue line on the left point that deflected off the knob of Tim Thomas' goal stick into the top corner with 6:23 left in the game.

Simon Gagne extended the Lightning lead to 5-1 with an empty net goal with 2:31 left in the game.

Johnny Boychuk added a goal with 1:01 left in the game to account for the 5-2 final score. Boychuk's shot appeared to be on course to go well wide of the net, but it deflected off the skate of  Marc-Andre Bergeron and through Roloson's five-hole.

Frustration clearly got the best of Nathan Horton and Milan Lucic in the game's final minute. Horton got tangled up with Dominic Moore along the boards. Horton threw a short gloved punch at Moore. Milan Lucic skated over to the ensuing scrum and threw a gloved sucker-punched at Victor Hedman. Both Lucic and Horton received 2-minute minors for roughing and 10 minute misconducts and could possibly face other disciplinary action from the league.



 

Notes:

- The Bruins have brought back a former player for each playoff game to serve as "honorary captain" by starting the giant Bruins flag around the arena. Ray Bourque was tonight's honorary captain.

- The Bruins had a moment of silence for former Minnesota Wild and New York Ranger tough guy Derek Boogaard, who died unexpectedly last night at the age of 28.

- Bruins owner Jeremy Jacobs made is seemingly annual pilgrimage from Buffalo to Boston to take in this game. I wonder if he got lost finding the building.

- That was a frustrating game, but Horton and Lucic need to be smarter than that. The Bruins are already with Patrice Bergeron, they can not afford to do stupid things that could cost them the services of two-thirds of their top line.

- I absolutely hate this trend of players getting jumped after clean hits. Johnny Boychuk should not have had to answer for his clean hit on Simon Gagne and he certainty should not have been the only one going the box after Vincent Lecavalier's retaliation.

- The Bruins clearly missed Patrice Bergeron tonight. The most obvious evidence of that was their performance at the dot. The B's won 26 of 67 face-offs (39%), including a dismal 3 for 17 showing by David Krejci.

- The Bruins' power outage continues: the B's were 0 for 4 on the power play tonight and are now 2 for 41 in the playoffs (4.9%).

- Adam McQuaid (neck) returned to the lineup tonight for the B's. The B's blue liner logged 12:29 of ice time and was one of two Bruins to finish with a positive +/- (Tomas Kaberle was the other, which proved that +/- is a somewhat useless stat.)

- The most stressful thing about playing in the playoffs for 19-year-old Tyler Seguin is probably having to grow a beard. Move off Clayton Bigsby. There is a new patchy beard king.

- The Lightning out-shot the Bruins 34-33.

- The Lightning blocked 17 shots to the Bruins' 9.

- It was a Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde performance for Tim Thomas (29 saves) tonight. He gave up at least one or two soft goals that he would like to have back, but also made some spectacular saves that keep the Bruins within striking range for most of the game. This game could have been a lot uglier if it was not for the play of Tim Thomas.

- I usually pick a photo that tells the game story for the main picture, but I just had to include this one as well. It looks skate blades are bringing back traumatic memories for Guy Boucher. Also, that chick behind the bench is mint.

Post-Game Quotes from both teams after the jump...

Star-divide

Quotes

Tampa Bay forward Dominic Moore on if he thinks the Lightning frustrated the Bruins tonight:

"I don’t know, I think they are competing.  That is what you have to do.  You just have to try and maintain our focus as well."

Tomas Kaberle on coughing the puck up to Teddy Purcell, which led to a goal:

"He didn’t take it from me, the puck slid on my blade and I tried to make a move. Those things you have to put behind you, the past behind you. I felt good in the first period, I thought I had good legs, when you make a mistake, you have to put it behind you, that’s all you have to do. If you keep thinking about it it’s not going to make you any better."

Tomas Kaberle on giving up 3 goals in 1:25 in the first period:

It’s tough, we pretty much gave them every single one of them. And we never gave up after. We know we are better in here and we have to show it in the second game. You know they are dangerous up front and you have to play in their zone and there is their goalie. We know it is not going to be an easy series. And we have to put it behind us right now and think about what is going to happen on Tuesday. 

Lightning forward Martin St. Louis on his team's willingness to block shots

"Well, I mean, any shot that doesn’t get to the net doesn’t have a chance to go in. so we take pride in that. Our PK, they blocked a lot of shots. But it is a mentality. You want to get that shot, and block that shot, and make an attempt to block every shot, so Roley gets less work."

Tyler Seguin on the difference between regular season games and playoff games:

"I’ve been saying it just from watching it up top. The intensity level and the tempo and being out there my first couple shifts I could really feel a difference. Even I was saying, after All-Star Break, the tempo did pick up more now. But I try to use that in my game, I try to use my speed, and usually it works out."

"I think the first period until my goal I kind of had an exciting rush going through my body. And after the third, fourth shift I felt more comfortable, I scored that goal, I felt more comfortable in the second. And then carried that in the third and I felt great in the third."

- Tyler Seguin

Tyler Seguin when asked if he wants to get power play time:

"Well I definitely do, but I know what I got to do right now. I got to contribute any way I can and if I get that opportunity I’m going to try to make the most of it. And I know I’ve been sitting out all playoffs, so I understand why I’m not being thrown on the power play right away."

Tim Thomas on Brett Clark's goal:

"It went right armpit. It was backhand. Backhanders are always a little bit harder to tell where they’re going to go. I was looking for who he was going to pass it to, then I was trying to figure out who he was. Because, not purposely, but other people’s tendencies. And then he goes to the backhand and it’s hard to tell where backhands are going to go. I was just trying to put my chest in the center of the net, and it was just a seeing-eye puck."

Victor Hedman on getting punched by Milan Lucic in the game's final minute:

"Well there is not too much to say. That is part of the game too. I have to expect that and there is nothing I can do about it. That's what he did, and I wasn’t expecting it. So that is why it took me a little aback."

"The first one is behind us now and I don’t want to make excuses but it’s only one game. There’s no point to get frustrated. It’s a series of seven so we’ve still got some hockey left and if we just take the positive things from tonight’s game then we’re good enough to win some games."

- David Krejci

David Krejci on playing without Patrice Bergeron:

"He’s been one of our best players so it’s hard to play without him but we’ve done it before. Like I said again, I don’t think it should have been 3-0 in the first period but it happened. It could have been a different story. I think we had some chances and they buried them. In the next game if we learn from it and we bury ours, who knows, Patrice might be back. I don’t know what is the story but we just got to stay positive here and just keep going."

Lightning forward Simon Gagne on Johnny Boychuk's hit:

"It was a clean hit. That was good. I had the puck in my skate. I know somebody was going to come, but I didn’t know it was going to be him. He is a pretty good physical defenseman and he got me in the chest. It was a clean hit. It was good. Nothing happened. It was good. Vinny (Lecavalier) went after him a little bit. I didn’t see what happened. I think he punched him or something, so that is why we got a power play and we were able to score that four-one because of that. That was maybe, not the difference in the game, but a big goal for us after that."

"It’s a first game loss. Obviously it’s not a perfect world. Every team we play they are obviously going to be a good opponent and we need to get ready for game two."

- Zdeno Chara

Zdeno Chara on Patrice Bergeron's absence:

"Obviously he’s a big part of our team but we have to find a way to play without him right now. Injuries do happen and we need to find a way to play without guys when they do get hurt."

Tampa Bay head coach Guy Boucher on Tim Thomas:

"I thought Tim Thomas made some really, really solid saves when we basically had our hands up on the bench thinking that was a sure goal."

Guy Boucher on the Bruins' intensity:

"We knew they were going to come out charging, that was no secret for anybody.  We knew they were going to be elevated by their crowd.  We had a game plan for it.  They are a really good team, they came out hard.  They are going to come out harder the next game.  I’m expecting [Patrice] Bergeron to be in the game.  Tim Thomas is going to make miracles.  I would be shocked if he doesn’t come back with his best game of the playoffs.  They came back in the first series, from two games.  It’s only one game, we’ve done nothing yet."

Apparently, Boucher has the same doctorate of medicine that Mark Recchi has or he was saying to expect the worst situation possible for the Lightning to be prepared. I'm not sure which.

Claude Julien on Tyler Seguin's performance:

"He had a good game. I thought when he had his chance, we took advantage of it and scored and obviously he had a lot of energy tonight and excitement in his game, so he was a good player for us."

Claude Julien on missing Patrice Bergeron's face-off skills:

"Well I’ve said that before we even played the game that it’s so important to start with the puck. When you don’t win as many draws as you’re used to, you’re backpedaling a little bit and those lost draws, and we know how quickly they counter. It certainly didn’t help our game tonight."

Claude Julien on if he considered using Tyler Seguin on the power play:

"No comment."

Comment 159 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Claude Julien is Barry Melrosing Tyler Seguin

Also, that Kaberle got seemingly unlimited ice-time (at least on PP) after his giveaway is indefensible. He’s been absolutely dreadful and I’d rather Kampfer right now.

by TomServo42 on May 15, 2011 1:19 AM EDT reply actions  

Stamkos seemed to turn out all right despite Melrose refusing to play him simply to sell tickets. Melrose getting fired over that was a joke.

by Stanley Cup of Chowder on May 15, 2011 1:23 AM EDT up reply actions  

He got fired because his coaching system was “go out there, skate around, try to score I guess”

Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Round 1: NO HABS NO (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on May 15, 2011 3:13 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

well, that’s great you don’t think he’ll be screwed up long term. But if he can contribute now why should he get Shawn Thornton minutes?

by TomServo42 on May 15, 2011 11:09 AM EDT up reply actions  

Shawn Thornton is a stanley cup champion, duh

Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Round 1: NO HABS NO (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on May 15, 2011 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think CJ would chase every gifted goal scorer out of Boston that isn’t Iginla or Datsyuk. Unless you bring a physical or defensive aspect to your game, CJ thinks you are wasting the ice time of a third line winger that played D in midget once. There is no reason for a kid that can undress a D pair and score damn near the first time he touches the puck in his first ever playoff game that happens to be the conference finals to be watching the game with Cam and PC.

by MattS on May 15, 2011 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Seguin's Playoff Beard

…or lack there of looks exactly like mine. But hey I just turned 20 so I’m glad I’m not the only one being laughed at for looking patchy. Tough loss but minus that 1:45 of crap play and the empty netter they one 2-1 so that’s the bright spot for me.

by Ted Hoefel on May 15, 2011 1:36 AM EDT reply actions  

Definitely a Jekyll/Hyde night. Some thoughts-

Thomas’ play was very reminiscent of the later half of the Montreal series. He let in some soft ones but made some huge saves too.

I wouldn’t be surprised if Lucic sat a game for his sucker punch. That was one of the, if not the, nadir of this game. It’s easy to say this sitting on the sidelines but that was the act of a loser. A sore one at that.

That power play goal (which shouldn’t have been a powerplay in the first place) resulted from a failed clear. One of our guys had the puck and tried to go around the net and launch it out and halfway whiffed on the clear and it stayed in.

The Kaberle trade is turning out to be the inverse image of the Kessel trade. The guy stinks on ice. I’m with TomServo in wanting Kampfer out there over him. We’ve already demoted the guy to the lowest pairing and he still managed to not only fail to meet very modest expectations but actually depress me. Get him off the PP or at least not paired with Chara. That’s a crapshoot and it’s only getting worse. Tampa was leading out against Chara about 25 feet by the 4th pp. They know the playbook when you telegraph it that bad. At this point I’m one hair short of hoping we don’t resign Kaberle to save a 2nd round draft pick.

For our worst loss of the playoffs this year this game did not scare me the way our initial flops against Montreal did. If we can do the same exact things and not shit the bed for 3 goals in 1:45 then we have a real series.

by Sinnach on May 15, 2011 1:44 AM EDT reply actions  

if you’re hoping not to give up that 2nd, then you’re also hoping we don’t make the SCF. It’s a pick for re-signing or Cup Finals

by TomServo42 on May 15, 2011 1:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

I agree that Kaberle has been pretty useless on the power play. I mean everyone knows he is going to fake a half slapper and just pass it back to Chara. The problem is they need someone that can move the puck and skate a little bit to be paired w/ Chara on the power play. With Bergeron out, that takes away one of their options for a point man on the PP. Mark Recchi has played the point at times, but I don’t think that is the direction the B’s want to go.

I have to admit, the B’s did some good things on the power play tonight but they still are not getting the results. I am all for easing Seguin into playoff hockey, but Seguin on the power play couldn’t hurt.

by Stanley Cup of Chowder on May 15, 2011 1:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

Kaberle has been pretty disappointing at all aspects of his game. He’s starting to just dump the puck in at the red line now and has seem to lose all his confidence in his play making and passing ability.

At this point I don’t think anything could hurt the power play. They seem to just be throwing different guys out there and saying “Well, can you fix this?”. I’m not entirely sure it’s the players as much it is how the coaching staff wants to run the power play.

by MattS on May 15, 2011 12:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

It has to be their setup/coaching, because it seems like no matter who they put out there, it won’t work.

by phonymahoney on May 15, 2011 10:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

I have no further game comments; nice job Mr. Chowder

But, I wonder…was that the chick referenced in the gamethread? Could be a tad horsefaced, but I wouldn’t kick her out of bed for eating crackers.

I hope for a better result next time (game outcome, not chick behind bench).

Do I contradict myself? Very well then I contradict myself, (I am large, I contain multitudes.)
Banworthy.

by whine_country on May 15, 2011 2:14 AM EDT reply actions  

good coverage stan

let up some bad goals and thomas stopped some that shoulda gone in..normal day

by muffinman2 on May 15, 2011 2:18 AM EDT reply actions  

That was hardly

A cross check from Lecavalier. I agree that it was a clean hit and he didn’t need to say anything, but there’s a difference between getting in somebody’s face and crosschecking them

by Hillbutton on May 15, 2011 4:24 AM EDT reply actions  

from a post not too long ago….

Bergeron was a MONSTER on the ice. Leading in Face Offs, Points and get this. . . leading the Bruins in HITS!!!!! We are going to feel the effect of not having him, and let me tell you where…

The Power Play looked passable ONLY when he was on the ice.
The PK has a HUGH hole when he is not there. Who will take the face offs in our zone?
 Think back to game four, 3rd period against the Flyers. Once Bergeron left the game I think I remember the Bruins winning 2 faceoff and loosing all the remining ones.
Tampa has an INCREDIBLE Power Play.
No Bergeron = DEEP DO-DO.

by douces3 on May 15, 2011 8:06 AM EDT reply actions  

bolts fan perspective

I think we Bolts fans have a bit of an inferiority complex due to a lot of media never giving our team “respect” (e.g. the loch ness monster comparison, headlines of capitals & penguins “losing” vs. lightning “winning”). So I guess something about Phunwin’s dismissal of Tampa ticked me off, because he clearly hadn’t watched the Lightning play in the past eight games. We’ve been watching our team deal (and struggle) with a completely new system this past year, and to call our playoff run a “hot streak” is to ignore the fact that our players have finally gotten a firm grasp of how to play our game.

A few points:

1) Our Tampa 1-3-1 is a legit system (finally). We’re learning how to adapt our 1-3-1 to fit the team/circumstances, and in the first game I saw a lot of transitions into a two-man forecheck too. A lot of fans claim that the 1-3-1 isn’t as good as they heard because they think of it as purely a neutral zone trap and they see their players crossing the blue line without much problems. But note the quality of shots they get once the players get past the line. There’s a reason the lightning led the league in blocked shots (64 more than the Bruins, who I’m pretty sure take pride in their blocked shots as well), and that’s cause they were in position to do so. This is why you shouldn’t expect regression from Roloson: he’s seeing some incredibly easy shots the past twenty games or so.

2) Our system is incredibly frustrating to play against. It’s a lot easier to say “We’re going to play smart” then actually doing it against our team. There was a clip in the Hockey Night in Canada presentation where one of your players snapped their stick and petulantly stomped it against the floor. And there was that sucker punch at the end (Don’t worry, it won’t be a suspension because the league never sticks up for Tampa). This’ll be a problem because our special teams eats Boston’s alive, especially when you guys don’t have Patrice.

3) Our third line is damn good. They’re not journeymen, they’re all in their first few seasons. They don’t just “chip in” goals; they’ve had the prettiest goals this series (Watch the highlights). And you can’t put Chara on them because of Stamkos, Lecavailer, Gagne, St. Louis, and Malone. They’re not flukes either.

I guess my point is I’m tired of excuses from the other team. I’m confident we could beat your team even if it had Patrice Bergeron back (and I’d actually prefer him back just so there will be no excuses). So don’t begrudgingly say: We gave the game away, We shot ourselves in the foot. Give us a little respect. We swept the best team in the conference with all of their players uninjured.

Lightning in 5. (6, if Bergeron returns in the next few games)

by CrowServer on May 15, 2011 9:15 AM EDT reply actions  

Us, our, we. Ugh….

Don’t you have a nascar race to analyze? Maybe a bill engvall comedy hour to watch?

by delta on May 15, 2011 10:43 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

We, we, we all the way home. I did not see you guys on the ice last ice. I must have missed it. You probably got less ice time than Seguin.

by Stanley Cup of Chowder on May 15, 2011 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

is this a SCOC thing? or a Boston thing?

everywhere else I’ve been, it’s fairly accepted to use first person in reference to the team you support. personally, I thought the thing that stuck out about that post is that it was way too much gloating after only one game. or maybe that he signed up with the name “CrowServer” for the exclusive purpose of writing one post on an opponent’s blog that didn’t even interact with the game recap. But the first person is a reasonable convention

by Incipient_Senescence on May 15, 2011 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

is this a SCOC thing? or a Boston thing?

everywhere else I’ve been, it’s fairly accepted to use first person in reference to the team you support. personally, I thought the thing that stuck out about that post is that it was way too much gloating after only one game. or maybe that he signed up with the name “CrowServer” for the exclusive purpose of writing one post on an opponent’s blog that didn’t even interact with the game recap. But the first person is a reasonable convention

by Incipient_Senescence on May 15, 2011 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

It’s a retarded delta and SCoC-the-poster thing. To continue the discussion, you can’t say your special teams ate ours alive because our powerplay just objectively sucks real bad.

Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Round 1: NO HABS NO (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on May 15, 2011 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

Sorry, we can’t all delusionally think we are on the team like Cornelius here.

YOU sat there drinking beer and watching hockey. THEY played. WE didn’t do shit.

by Stanley Cup of Chowder on May 15, 2011 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yes but to respond to a post with three points like that with “you’re not on the team, you can’t say we” instead of, say, responding to the post itself.

Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Round 1: NO HABS NO (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on May 15, 2011 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

forgive me if I'm overstepping myself as a guest here

but this language is not unusual. non-soldiers talk about winning wars in the first person. non-politicians talk about winning elections in the first person. I guess you can be bothered by it if you like, but you have to pick your spots when fighting the language (my only spot, I think, is rejecting any use of “barbeque” to mean “grill” or “grilled meat,” because barbeque is a distinct ontological category that’s hella tasty).

And that post had so many points of contention, it seemed odd to focus on that.

by Incipient_Senescence on May 15, 2011 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

It has always bothered me. Telltale sign of a bandwagon jumper or a jock-sniffer fan boy.

by Stanley Cup of Chowder on May 15, 2011 12:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t think it’s either of those. I’ve been a diehard fan since I can remember, I refer to the Bruins as “we” half the time because I feel like I’ve invested more emotionally over the years than half the players have. I’m far from a fairweather fan or a bandwagon jumper (I’m a girl with a Bruins tattoo, this is not normal), but I consider people using we/us/our as a sign that they love the team.

by phonymahoney on May 15, 2011 10:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

guess you're a jock-sniffer fan girl then

:-p

Actually, you probably have more emotionally invested than a lot of the players.

by Incipient_Senescence on May 15, 2011 11:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Really?

I don’t think I’m part of the team. Do you think the thousands of fans that chant “We’re #1” really think they were on the ice? (This is a rhetorical question, but I don’t want to be mocked again because of misunderstandings, so: They don’t.) Come on, part of the experience of being a fan is empathizing with the players playing the game. Sports work on a visceral level, so that kids dream that they’re the ones scoring a Stanley Cup overtime winner. It’s also a shorthand, because saying “My Team (Which I Don’t Own But It’s A Team I Root For) Is Number One” doesn’t have the same ring.

by CrowServer on May 15, 2011 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

this pretty much summarizes my linguistic point

but why don’t you come over and hang out with us on Raw Charge instead of pestering the opponents. maybe I’m overly superstitious, but I’m nervous about gloating before the series is over.

by Incipient_Senescence on May 15, 2011 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Knowledgeable passionate fans are always welcome over no matter what team they root for. You guys are 100% welcome here.

by Stanley Cup of Chowder on May 15, 2011 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

SCOC: Thank you!

IS: I like talking with opponent fans more because I usually get a better sense of strengths/weaknesses of the other team from them, which makes watching the game a lot more fun/nuanced. I lurk around RawCharge from time to time though!

by CrowServer on May 15, 2011 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Try Lightning, Bolts, they, Tampa Bay, The team Scarface coaches, the former promotional vehicle for Saw movie, the team a dude from Boston saved, the team that played in the shittiest baseball stadium ever constructed, etc.

by Stanley Cup of Chowder on May 15, 2011 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wow, that is devotion searching through the thousands of comments I have posted to find 2 times in a game thread that I said “we”. Congratulations you can use the internet. I’m awfully proud of you.

by Stanley Cup of Chowder on May 15, 2011 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nah, there’s a search function. The two instances are on the first page. =)

by CrowServer on May 15, 2011 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think Pronger had slashed someone and I was saying that the fans took note of it.

by Stanley Cup of Chowder on May 15, 2011 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Okay, more internet sleuthing!

From CanesCountry:

Don’t expect "real good"….I guess one man’s trash is another man’s treasure. You have both our salary dumps patrolling your blue line.

by Stanley Cup of Chowder on Jul 24, 2009 10:15 PM PDT

It happens, and it’s a natural thing to do.

But now that I think about it, you’re probably right: There might actually be a correlation between fan intelligence and frequency of “our” pronouns. It’s your site, so I’ll refrain from doing it in the future.

by CrowServer on May 15, 2011 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

I think I read this in, of all places, a Stephen King book, where he goes (paraphrasing), “we as fans tend to say personal pronouns such as ‘our, we, etc.’ when the team we root for is winning. We refer to the team in the 3rd person (they, their, etc.) when the team loses.”

It’s all I’m saying on the matter.

by Johnny Appleseed on May 15, 2011 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

nobody really cares if you say it or not I was just having a bit of fun.

by delta on May 16, 2011 9:37 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

dude, he got you.

no more excuses.

In Lax We Trust - Official Pro Lacrosse Blog of SBN
Inside Hockey - NHL Analyst

by Marisa Ingemi on May 16, 2011 1:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

rec

Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Round 1: NO HABS NO (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on May 16, 2011 8:02 AM EDT up reply actions  

also

because the two teams had combined for 0 for 7 on the power play until quite late when the game was either already decided or very close to it. I do expect us to have an advantage on special teams because that’s been the case all season and through the playoffs. But if it does happen, it’s not news. And if it doesn’t, I’m worried, because y’all have owned 5 on 5 in the first two rounds.

by Incipient_Senescence on May 15, 2011 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

And throughout the year, yeah. Bruins own bones on 5-on-5 most of the time.

Now, somebody get Krejci to mistakenly pick and inspiring song on the jukebox tomorrow.

Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Round 1: NO HABS NO (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on May 15, 2011 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

*an

Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Round 1: NO HABS NO (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on May 15, 2011 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think both teams have the same (obviously opposite) idea here

Bolts: we can win the series if we can avoid a big 5 on 5 deficit (assuming special teams continues as usual)

Bruins: we can win the series if we can avoid a big special teams deficit (assuming 5 on 5 continues as usual)

by Incipient_Senescence on May 15, 2011 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

Haha yeah sure corny. I’m sure me and scoc are the only guys on the planet that can’t stand people talking like they are on the reserve squad. Cmon, I’m sure you guys are smart. You
can use other words that aren’t in thee first person.

You enjoy talking about how much you love the “after the jump” link, you don’t see me giving you shit for that.

by delta on May 16, 2011 9:30 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

I don’t care if you guys hate it, I try not to use the ol’ “we” anyway, but I think it’s lame that instead of arguing his points, you guys got on him about the use of “we”. That’s all! :)

by phonymahoney on May 16, 2011 9:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

I responded to his points as well, but I would take him more serious if he didn’t write like he was the 3rd-string goalie.

by Stanley Cup of Chowder on May 16, 2011 10:07 AM EDT up reply actions  

That made me giggle.

If he were a third-string goalie, he could’ve seen significant playing time with the Flyers.

by phonymahoney on May 16, 2011 10:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

Wow, NASCAR references.

That was pretty old already two years ago against Carolina.

by 13_Legion on May 15, 2011 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Both teams are from the south last I checked. the same, tired stereotypes apply well to Tampa. If you’d like Ill resort to the huntin n fishin, hootin n a hollerin, country music listenin ones instead. Nascar was thee easy way out.

by delta on May 16, 2011 9:34 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Or banjo music, even.

by phonymahoney on May 16, 2011 9:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, that transient population down there in Tampa is pure good ol’ boy I’m sure.

by 13_Legion on May 16, 2011 10:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

I know some families that moved to the Carolinas in the early 90s to follow work. Their kids are big ’Cane fans due to the connection to the sport from the Yankee parents.

by 13_Legion on May 16, 2011 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

of course the smack-talking always forgets the good Southern stereotypes

like college football and barbeque. guess y’all did get banjo music. . .

Also, Florida is only a part-time Southern state. South Florida is Yankee, North Florida is Southern, and Central Florida is a bit of both.

by Incipient_Senescence on May 16, 2011 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

College football blows. Wake me up when they figure out a postseason tourney. Until then, it is just a corrupt system taking advantage of kids that don’t belong in college.

I always find it funny that the biggest college football fans are usually people with an 8th grade education.

by Stanley Cup of Chowder on May 16, 2011 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

you should come over to the SBNation UT blog

we have a pastor, a lawyer, and a nuclear engineering PhD candidate as our three main writers.

Actually, I think the only college football fan I know with an 8th grade education is my little sister, who will have a 9th grade education in a couple weeks.

by Incipient_Senescence on May 16, 2011 12:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

To be fair, the only ones we hear about in the news are more of the Harvey Updyke Jr model than the ones you’re describing. He even had all his teeth!

Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Round 1: NO HABS NO (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on May 16, 2011 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Uhhh. . .

Alabama fan. Enough said.

(for those not versed in SEC football, The Third Saturday in October matchup between Alabama and Tennessee traditionally determined the conference championship from the days of the Bear and the General).

by Incipient_Senescence on May 16, 2011 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Couldn't have said it better myself.

Thank you!

And what’s up with them attaching themselves to an arbitrary school that they didn’t attend and probably don’t even know anyone who has attended?!

by phonymahoney on May 16, 2011 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybe, it just that we have no rooting interest here. Unless, you are one of the SuperFrauds from BC, went to school in the Midwest or the South, or are a gambler, most people around here pretty apathetic when it comes to D1 college football. Without a rooting interest it is just too many teams and too many players to follow.

by Stanley Cup of Chowder on May 16, 2011 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I understand

Because we tend to put a similarly lower value on professional sports. I very rarely watch the NFL, and when I do, it’s only to follow my college players (Manning, Berry, Foster, Witten, Mayo. . . ). I never watch the NBA, and baseball. . . right. Yeah, the NHL is pretty much the only professional league I follow, unless you count international soccer, which bears a much closer resemblance to college sports (no free agency or huge contracts, national/regional pride, etc).

by Incipient_Senescence on May 16, 2011 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

no free agency or huge contracts

…unless you are coach and you are the highest paid state employee or you are blue chip player getting paid by a booster.

by Stanley Cup of Chowder on May 16, 2011 2:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

true, coaches are the exception

but that parallel still holds between international stuff and college stuff. And obviously cheating is an exception because it’s. . . you know. . . cheating. Lewis Grizzard (Georgia grad) had a really nice commentary on Florida’s recruiting system in his book Shoot Low Boys, They’re Riding Shetland Ponies.

by Incipient_Senescence on May 16, 2011 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

How about minor league hockey?

by 13_Legion on May 16, 2011 3:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

do not follow minor league hockey

it’s hard enough to follow the NHL. before the days of finding things on the internet, it was damn near impossible.

by Incipient_Senescence on May 16, 2011 3:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

Haha, fair enough.

We have plenty of AHL franchises around here, and many strong college programs, so there’s a great deal to pick from to support.

by 13_Legion on May 16, 2011 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

I just can’t appreciate a league/division/whatever where there’s no game/series that determines who the clear winner is. Sure, there are a bunch of random bowl games, and they say _ team is #1, but they haven’t played the majority of the other teams, so the whole system is kind of goofy to me. To each their own, I guess.

by phonymahoney on May 16, 2011 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

well, most of us want a playoff

but we don’t stop loving the sport because there isn’t one. Also, you could argue that the regional accomplishments (conference championships) are more important than the national accomplishments (national championships). In fact, in the old days, the final polls were released at the end of the regular season. The bowls were a just-for-fun exhibition afterwards.

by Incipient_Senescence on May 16, 2011 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Being that I never started to like it, I I’ve no problem not loving it, but the lack of a playoff isn’t the only reason why.

by phonymahoney on May 16, 2011 4:17 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

This could be fun.

So what are some New England stereotypes that you hold close to your heart?

by 13_Legion on May 16, 2011 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Is this when people start typing “wicked pissah”, as if those two words are ever used together outside of an SNL skit?

by phonymahoney on May 16, 2011 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

I hate college football. I dislike all football, but I loathe college football. That’s a “good” stereotype? ;)

by phonymahoney on May 16, 2011 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

well you're missing out

the only sports event that touches the SEC football season is the World Cup. (as you might imagine, given the rivalry between soccer and football fans, I take a lot of crap for liking them both. but what can I say? they’re both awesome).

by Incipient_Senescence on May 16, 2011 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

College sports in New England, I’d say the biggest one is College hockey.

Lots of strong national programs in and around Boston.

And the Beanpot tournament, great local tradition.

by 13_Legion on May 16, 2011 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Even college hockey is kind of a niche sport here aside from the Beanpot.

by Stanley Cup of Chowder on May 16, 2011 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

Used to date a girl from New Hampshire and everyone I ever met associated with her were all about the WildCats.

If anything is “big” I’d say it is the hockey.

by 13_Legion on May 16, 2011 3:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Monarchs hockey, a close second.

by 13_Legion on May 16, 2011 3:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

is he as troll-looking as his brother?

by phonymahoney on May 16, 2011 4:43 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Not as downright horrible as Phil, but very Lurch-looking for sure. That’s a sweet fivehead and mushroom cut he’s got going on there. I wonder what the sister looks like.

by phonymahoney on May 16, 2011 9:35 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

What do you expect from Wisconsin?

Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Round 1: NO HABS NO (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on May 17, 2011 9:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hey Wisconsin isn’t all bad. They have Beer, Brats, Cheese, Fireworks, and Indian Casinos.

by Stanley Cup of Chowder on May 17, 2011 6:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Never said it was an unpleasant place. Just that it’s not known for its lookers.

Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Round 1: NO HABS NO (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on May 18, 2011 9:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

I always liked college hockey, but I was never really a huge fan until the 94-95 NHL lockout, because BU hockey games were on WABU way back then. Beanpot rocks as well.

by phonymahoney on May 16, 2011 4:38 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

There was a lockout in 95?

Somebody should tell the Devils, then.
 
;)

"Jason Heyward was a Greek philosopher reincarnated as a baseball player." - Don Sutton

by UMDBHIK on May 16, 2011 8:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think they know

since the lockout is usually the reason given for them being the only 5 seed or worse to win the Stanley Cup.

Heel for school, Vol for life!

Go Bolts! Out West, go Preds! Southern hockey solidarity!

by Incipient_Senescence on May 16, 2011 8:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Perhaps

somebody should tell me, then.

"Jason Heyward was a Greek philosopher reincarnated as a baseball player." - Don Sutton

by UMDBHIK on May 16, 2011 10:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Don’t worry, it won’t be a suspension because the league never sticks up for Tampa

I guess Tampa Bay fans do have an inferiority complex.

by Stanley Cup of Chowder on May 15, 2011 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions  

Haha. That might be just me. =)

by CrowServer on May 15, 2011 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

And I counter with:

1) No it’s not.

2) Not really.

3) Maybe that’s because Tampa’s first two lines routinely get completely shut down and remain off the score sheet?

Apart from spotting Tampa a 3 goal lead in the first due to some bad luck and brain farts, there wasn’t much I saw from Tampa to worry me about the rest of the series. They aren’t going to score 3 goals inside of 90 seconds each game. Boston gave Tampa 3 gifts and it was hardly an accurate representation of what the Bruins can bring. Boston just shit the bed last night, they do that from time to time and it takes them a game or so to get their heads out of their own asses.

by MattS on May 15, 2011 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

Can’t really argue constructively with your first two points. But your third point is what I mean. Chara’s ridiculously good and can shut down our first two lines, but I haven’t seen an answer for our third line so far.

by CrowServer on May 15, 2011 12:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t think there needs to be an “answer”. The Bruin’s third line as it is right now lacks defensive ability in a huge way. Peverly can get that job done to some degree, but Ryder and Seguin can’t be bothered with defense play. Defensively, Boston’s third line is shit and isn’t going to be keeping anyone off the score sheets. They are responsible for Boston’s 2 goals though, so you could make a similar argument for there not being an answer for Boston’s third line.

by MattS on May 15, 2011 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

the Bolts third line has actually been in beast mode all through the playoffs

but that isn’t because the first two lines are “routinely shut down and remain off the score sheet.” Marty St. Louis (1st line) has 14 points (3rd in the NHL), Vinny Lecavalier (1st/2nd line) has 12 points (8th in the NHL), and Teddy Purcell (2nd line) has 13 points (6th in the NHL).

Also, while I agree that Boston had some unusually bad giveaways last night, I’m not sure how you didn’t see enough to worry you. That up-and-down early in the game should send a message that neither team should ever get comfortable in this series.

by Incipient_Senescence on May 15, 2011 1:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

1. Your usename is pretty obnoxious.
2. The lightning won one game. A SINGLE GAME. Cocky much? See #1.
3. What excuses? I’m pretty sure the vast majority of us doesn’t think that the Bruins lost last night because Bergy was out. It’s clear they made some crucial mistakes at the start and just couldn’t make up for them.

by phonymahoney on May 15, 2011 10:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

How many games had you predicted originally?

by 13_Legion on May 16, 2011 10:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

I was not able to see the game, but from what I’ve heard Seguin shoulda been out there more.

In Lax We Trust - Official Pro Lacrosse Blog of SBN
Inside Hockey - NHL Analyst

by Marisa Ingemi on May 15, 2011 9:39 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

with two points while at third lowest TOI on the team, that’s an understatement. And for anyone saying “but he was on ice for the first two goals,” go back and watch what Ryder’s doing on those two shifts.

by TomServo42 on May 15, 2011 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

I was not able to watch, like I said.

but sounds typical to me. sigh.

In Lax We Trust - Official Pro Lacrosse Blog of SBN
Inside Hockey - NHL Analyst

by Marisa Ingemi on May 15, 2011 11:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ryder does what he always does when he doesn’t have the puck, skate around looking for flowers to pick on the ice.

by MattS on May 15, 2011 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

That is true and I figured for sure they would get trapped last night but that didn’t seem to happen. Still, I think it’s coming though. Of course the 4th line has seemed to have some trouble too but I think that is just them getting caught late in their shift against the opposing team’s top line.

by MattS on May 15, 2011 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

…and it absolutely should.

by phonymahoney on May 16, 2011 4:44 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Actually, Ryder wasn't even skating on goal #2.

He just kind of took a half-hearted slap at Tampa’s defenseman. Looked like a squirt doing it, too.

"Jason Heyward was a Greek philosopher reincarnated as a baseball player." - Don Sutton

by UMDBHIK on May 15, 2011 12:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

ding ding. He’s fully responsible for that uncontested entry into the offensive zone

by TomServo42 on May 15, 2011 1:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Claude is an absolute dope if he doesn’t even try putting Seguin on the PP. Anybody, anyTHING, is better than what he has been shoveling out there lately. I’d start a laundry basket over Kaberle and possibly a coffee maker over Boychuk. The guys just aren’t getting it done.

by delta on May 15, 2011 10:39 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

I agree that you are going to give Seguin extra minutes, the power play is the place to do it.

by Stanley Cup of Chowder on May 15, 2011 11:22 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hey! I've got...

…an idea! Since we all believe Ryder and Seguin are defensive liabilities, and our PP outright sucks, why don’t we “demote” these two “one dimensional, offensive players” to the one place they shouldn’t have to play defense… the power play! Because right now we seem to spend more time trying to get the puck into the zone, let alone figure out what to do after we get there. These two “spend more time just skating around”, maybe that would be the ideal role for them.

But seriously, it would be nice to be in the other teams zone for 2 minutes, maybe even taking a shot or two, rather than perpetually chasing another bad dump back to our end again, and again, and again.

by Espo.LLc on May 15, 2011 8:41 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Practicing at full-contact, not sure if they have cleared him for game action. I doubt that you will see Claude go to him in this series.

by Stanley Cup of Chowder on May 15, 2011 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

i love how fresh blood to the team like Kaberle and Kelly get instant trust from Claude and guys who come up in our system (and even play well in the regular season) can’t get a chance

by TomServo42 on May 15, 2011 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

What has Kelly done not to deserve his spot? Kaberle has been awful, but a least you kind of know what you are getting with him. Kampfer is hurt and never played in a big game…not exactly a recipe for success.

by Stanley Cup of Chowder on May 15, 2011 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think there is a lot of blow over frustration now because he didn’t do a great job of replacing Bergy, but you really can’t expect anyone to replace Bergy. I don’t think Kelly fits in the second line, and he looked a bit lost out there. Kelly has played fantastic through the playoffs though and has been one of Boston’s best players for sure, he just didn’t click with that line. I don’t know what the answer is there, I know you don’t like Seguin playing center, I guess I’d give him a couple shifts and see what happens.

As for Kaberle, he’s been terrible. He’s doubting himself, he’s making bad decisions with the puck, and there is no reason to have him on the PP. If Kampfer is game ready status, I’d put him in the line up for a game. It’s not game 7, and if you are going to take the risk, you may as well do it when the series isn’t on the line.

by MattS on May 15, 2011 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

i expect zero risk to be taken. Kampfer will see no games as long as the D is healthy.

by TomServo42 on May 15, 2011 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

What is the greater risk? Playing a guy who is a vet but doubting himself or playing a rookie that might make some mistakes, but can be awesome?

by MattS on May 15, 2011 5:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’d caution everyone riding the Seguin Wave that, two points and talent aside, we’re talking about a rookie who is also riding his own wave by getting a chance to play in the playoffs. I worry that if he makes one or two rookie mistakes, not only might we see that playoff high he may be on come crashing down, but some of us, too, will be wiping out, talking about pulling him off the ice. Just want to make sure we don’t get too far ahead of ourselves. That said, I do hope Seguin continues to play well while he has the chance. That one move, practically skating full ice toward Roloson and getting a nice shot off (save, unfortunately made by Roli), was fun to watch, ala Bobby Orr.

by WeatherExperiment on May 15, 2011 10:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

he was referring to Kampfer, see above. But i don’t think most people calling for Seguin’s ice time to increase are saying he’ll be the savior. They’re calling for Claude to give ice time to offensive players who are performing when offense is in need, like down two goals late in a game

by TomServo42 on May 16, 2011 6:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I apologize. I realize now that I should have put this as a reply further above or simply as a stand-alone comment.

by WeatherExperiment on May 16, 2011 10:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

Why not sit Kabs and put Kampfer out there? He can’t possibly be worse than Kaberle. Maybe it would send a message to Kabs as well (although at this point, I think he’s beyond help).

by phonymahoney on May 16, 2011 8:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

He is hurt, has no playoff experience, and hasn’t played in weeks…

by Stanley Cup of Chowder on May 16, 2011 9:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

Thought I replied but I guess not.

I thought Kampfer was good to go now, and Kaberle hasn’t played well in weeks. I know the B’s would be putting themselves at risk for rookie mistakes, but how can they be worse than the crappy, mistake-laden defense and non-existent offense that Kabs has been bringing to the team?

by phonymahoney on May 16, 2011 10:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

I shut the TV off when Tampa made it 4-1, so I didn’t see the end of it, but I thought the B’s did some things well, and did some things rather poorly. As bad as the PP has been, it did manage to generate some chances against the Bolts’ otherworldly PK. That’s encouraging. Goal #1 was an unfortunate bounce due to Seids’ losing his stick. The next two goals you know Timmy wants to have back, because they were both stoppable, but he also got 0 help from his teammates on either one.
 
The biggest issue with the powerplay is how static it is. Decisions need to be quick, and players need to be moving in order to be effective. What I see is a lot of standing around the perimeter hoping for a good chance rather than making it happen. Look at Tampa’s PP and compare it to ours. The failure of the PP is entirely on Claude Julien’s shoulders. It’s pretty evident there aren’t a lot of adjustments being made by the staff. The Bruins will not win this series if the PP continues its failure to produce.
 
Game 2 becomes a must-win. Going to Tampa 0-2 is not a recipe for success.

"Jason Heyward was a Greek philosopher reincarnated as a baseball player." - Don Sutton

by UMDBHIK on May 15, 2011 1:02 PM EDT reply actions  

Does anybody else think that if the B’s can’t score on the power play, they’re gonna lose in 5 or less? Seems like the whole “going 0-for-diddly and still winning” has finally caught up with them.

by Johnny Appleseed on May 15, 2011 2:53 PM EDT reply actions  

Not really. Eating turnovers for lunch before games is what will sink Boston quickly if we keep it up. Almost every goal last night was caused by a Bruin coughing the puck up and Tampa capitalizing on that. The first goal resulted because Seidenberg had his stick knocked out of his hands but he was the first to the puck. Kaberle should have earned an assist for the 3rd goal. The 4th power play goal resulted from a failed clear that went right to their D at the blue line. The 5th empty netter was from a faceoff that Boston actually managed to win yet no one picked up.

Our PP stinks, no denying that. Unless it gets turned completely on its head and produces 3-4 goals a night Boston would still lose when they consistently and repeatedly make mistakes that lead to bunches of goals like they did in game 1.

Having said that, a pp goal wouldn’t hurt.

by Sinnach on May 15, 2011 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

No. The power play has sucked all through the playoffs and look where they are. They certainly need to improve the power play, no doubt about that. Even if they could get it up to 12%, that would be fantastic. Not sure that will happen though. It’s just way too predictable right now. I’m actually surprised Tampa doesn’t come out and pressure the points more. They’d have all the break aways they want if they did that.

by MattS on May 15, 2011 5:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes.

It’s definitely catching up with them. They need to be more aggressive and convert. We can’t go down two games to start.

by snowboard_kat on May 15, 2011 7:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sharks fan here

Sorry about the first game result.

Here’s hoping you put the Bolts back on their heels a bit in the next game. It’s hard to imagine Timmy (I don’t know what you call him here), having another 5 goals against night.

by anduriliam on May 15, 2011 6:45 PM EDT reply actions  

We call him… Timmy. :)

by phonymahoney on May 15, 2011 10:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm a fan of Tim Thomas

the rest of your team ain’t too bad either. ;)

I’m planning on rooting for your Bruins this series.

by anduriliam on May 16, 2011 5:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

we call him MISTER Tibbs

by TomServo42 on May 16, 2011 6:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

never

did I think that someone would quote In the Heat of the Night on SCoC. Bravo.

by phonymahoney on May 16, 2011 8:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

Bergy skated...

…before practice yesterday, per KPD. A feint glimmer…

by Arenacale on May 16, 2011 7:29 AM EDT reply actions  

non-contact though, correct?

by 13_Legion on May 16, 2011 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

Other side of the ice from the rest of the team.

Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Round 1: NO HABS NO (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on May 16, 2011 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

so, not-contact, be it indirect due to no one else being there.

I really still think we’re not seeing him Tuesday.

by 13_Legion on May 16, 2011 10:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t think we’ll see him in game 2, either… and I’m comfortable with that.

by phonymahoney on May 16, 2011 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

C'mon Bruins

This Canes fan is cheering for the Bruins. Even if it due to pure illness brought on by the thought of any Bolts success, I am sure that you all don’t mind the love. Please crunch St.Louis a.k.a. The Crooked Mickey Mouse and stifle this clown Bergenheim. I have to believe that the Bruins can eventually chase Duane from the pipes and dominate the ralph inducing team from the Bay.
Go Bruins

2 years to the Cup

by Caniac233 on May 16, 2011 7:34 AM EDT reply actions  

Claude comes to his senses

or caves to pressure: tyler seguin practicing with the PP

by TomServo42 on May 16, 2011 11:15 AM EDT reply actions  

…with Bergeron!

Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Round 1: NO HABS NO (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on May 16, 2011 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

I would be surprised to see Seguin on the power play in Game 2 or Bergeron on the ice.

Think Claude will only go to Seguin in desperation:

Claude Julien on if anything makes him reluctant to use Tyler Seguin on the power play and penalty kill…

“Not really. I think it’s a situation here where you’ve got to understand this is a 19 year old that hasn’t played in 11 games. He comes back in and you want to give him some small chunks to bite on, and certainly work his way up. But I think the other part is if our power play had not started picking it up, which I thought our first power play was really not a good one, our second one got a little better and then we got some shots starting to go through on the other one. Had it not, then we would have thrown him in there. But our power play’s been good the last couple of games, and just because you struggle on the first couple of ones, you explode it again and try something new. And I think had it not gone well, we would’ve, and he would’ve certainly been considered.”

Bergeron did not participate in full-contact drills.

by Stanley Cup of Chowder on May 16, 2011 11:59 AM EDT up reply actions  

If they only let him out for a few shifts and he scores, I’m okay with that.

Hockey Blog Adventure: New Post: Round 1: NO HABS NO (I'm also on Twitter.) GO BRUINS! (and Wild!)

by Cornelius Hardenbergh on May 16, 2011 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

This was Claude today: ""We want to develop him slowly. A lot like Van Riemsdyk. He’s developed well and didn’t play in playoffs last year"

by Stanley Cup of Chowder on May 16, 2011 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

PUNCH ALL THE WHALES!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Durling_headshot_small
NHL Playoffs 2012: Western Conference Finals Game Three Open Thread
Small
Dougie Hamilton OHL Jersey
Looch-t_cap_small
LA Kings - 2012 Stanley Cup Champions?
Durling_headshot_small
Belated USA-Canada IIHF Open Thread
Axe_small
Wishlist!
Milt_schmidt_small
The All-Boston Team: Summer Project
Small
Chance to win a Bruins Prize pack, anyone else have a few minutes for a university project?!
246904_10150207466208058_559893057_6815629_7738165_n_small
He said she said trade rumor thread
Small
NHL Playoff Format
Small
Thanks Chowder

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor

Thomas_small sarahconnors

Durling_headshot_small Ryan Durling

Editors

B75ed5811b_bradmarchand_09262006_small Phunwin

Me_small xokathryn

5531_630546183341_11011139_37429402_2472201_n_small Biz Jacobs

Doug_roma_small dwatson783

Authors

Small Scott Frano

Resized_small Kristian Limas

Profile_pic_small PeterMacKellar

427799_10150607786667127_578457126_9253226_1796777750_n_small Dave Carignan

Boooyyyccchhuuukkk_small Shelby Lefebvre