Bruins Come Close, But Drop Second Straight Game
Close, but no cigar. While that statement has relevance to the comeback Boston almost mounted in the third period, it can aptly describe the problems Boston faced all afternoon when moving out of their own zone. In a theme carried throughout Boston’s 2-1 loss to the Pittsburgh Penguins, the Bruins inability to capably breakout of their third of the ice cleanly was a deciding factor in today’s outcome. When Boston was successfully able to move the puck out of their zone, many of the clears were poor passes or simply chips with no real intended target.
Pittsburgh’s game winning goal, scored by Matt Cooke, came as a direct result of a bad clear - Dennis Seidenberg, feeling pressure below the goal line, fired a hybrid saucer pass/clearing attempt about waist-high toward Zach Hamill, who was unable to control the puck. Immediately corralled by the Pens and moved back into the B’s zone in what amounted to a 3-5 by the Pens. In a scene that could well be a microcosm of Boston’s recent defensive struggles, Cooke was able to take two chips at a rebound from a foot outside the crease, while all five Boston players were below the faceoff dots and three – Corvo, Hamill and Kelly – formed a triangle around Cooke to watched him put away the game winner without so much as putting a body on Cooke.
Pittsburgh kicked off the scoring to go up 1-0 with just nine seconds left in the first period as Evgeni Malkin put home a power play goal from a difficult angle to give the Pens some momentum headed into the intermission. Unlike prior games where the Bruins saved their best for the third period, Boston came out of the first intermission with good energy and generated some great opportunities in the second period, including a great pass from Seguin to a cutting Marchand that was steered just wide, but they were held scoreless through two periods.
Boston’s defense generated the bulk of the shots on goal for the game, including the team’s only goal in the game – after corralling a puck along the sideboards, Joe Corvo put a wrist shot on net that found its way through a screen and past Fleury 6:45 into the third. The final 10 minutes of the third provided a number of great scoring opportunities as Boston scrambled to put an equalizer on the board, but the Bruins weren’t able to get the goal they were looking for.
Despite the negative outlook of the previous three paragraphs, Boston could very well have won this game 4-1 or even 5-0 with just a few different bounces. However, it was another disappointing game for the home team, with the effort given at times not matching the effort needed to snap out of the funk. It’s said that you make your own luck, and based on the effort levels of both teams this afternoon, it was clear that Pittsburgh was the team determined to make their own luck, while the Bruins were just hoping for it to happen.
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Boston could very well have won this game 4-1 or even 5-0 with just a few different bounces.
Yeah, bounces like Seidenberg’s against Ottawa. Weren’t too many good chances by the forwards, we got kept to the perimeter all game long
I think we had more than that – Marchmont’s tip for Seguin, Hamill wiffing, Seguin’s breakaway. And had they locked down for 9 more seconds and put any type of pressure on Cooke, you’ve got a 3,4-0 game right there. It all comes down to effort though, which was spotty today.
Johnny Boychuk - The infamous bottle of $100,000 champagne, I thought it was meh.
by PeterMacKellar on Feb 4, 2012 5:03 PM EST up reply actions
i'll have to disagree here too....
the score looked much closer than it really was. pittsburgh kept most of boston’s chances to the outside……i’m surprised it wasn’t 3-0 or 4-0 pittsburgh.
the physical play was lacking and when that happens the bruins aren’t gonna win. so pissed off that boychuk missed that cooke hit. if there’s one player that needed to be traded, he would be the first on my list. don’t get me wrong, it’s not because he missed that hit— he consistently makes poor decisions with the puck in the offensive zone, his shot is overrated (powerful and very inaccurate) and does not hit nearly as hard as people give him credit for.
Did anyone see/know what happened to Seids? He apparently took about 20 stitches in his face, but I didn’t see what happened and if they mentioned how on NESN I missed that too.
Game was a disappointment, but the one positive was that they didn’t look as bad in this one as they have in other recent games and they didn’t give up more than 2 goals. They were kind of on a roll there giving up 3 or more per game.
They need to start finishing their chances and they need to learn how to capitalize on the PP-no reason they shouldn’t have scored with 4 minutes straight of PP time.
One thing I noticed on the PP – they wasted a good 30-45 sec when Pevs couldn’t hold it in twice. Had to come out and regroup both times.
Johnny Boychuk - The infamous bottle of $100,000 champagne, I thought it was meh.
by PeterMacKellar on Feb 4, 2012 5:31 PM EST up reply actions
In Pevs defense we think there may have been a rut there. The linesman went down once and looked like he caught an edge another time during that PP.
Even so, those two misses on the point were huge, and honestly not super characteristic of him. I like Pevs on the point-he is better than anyone else they have tried to use and he isn’t afraid to move.
Interesting point about a rut – was that just you noticed, or did they mention on NESN, too? I had NHLN so the Pens guys didn’t say anything about it that I remember.
I agree with Pevs being a good point option and he’s been very good when out there, but those two misses just killed the flow.
Johnny Boychuk - The infamous bottle of $100,000 champagne, I thought it was meh.
Damn, reply fail
Johnny Boychuk - The infamous bottle of $100,000 champagne, I thought it was meh.
by PeterMacKellar on Feb 4, 2012 5:54 PM EST up reply actions
NESN guys didn’t notice it. I just remember we noticed the linesman go down in the same place once and lose an edge another time (think the linesman went down after the 2nd time Pevs missed). My daughter actually noticed it and made a comment that she wondered if there wasn’t something screwy with the ice, because in the same place Pevs misssed twice, she saw the linesman struggling to stay on his skates twice.
She is pretty observant.
That was a really good catch. I remember seeing the ref fall, but I didn’t put it together.
Johnny Boychuk - The infamous bottle of $100,000 champagne, I thought it was meh.
by PeterMacKellar on Feb 4, 2012 7:21 PM EST up reply actions
hmmm,
That totally makes sense. I saw all that happen, but didn’t put 2 and 2 together there.
Kick his ass, Seabass!
by phonymahoney on Feb 5, 2012 10:44 AM EST up reply actions
Good game all
I really, really don’t want to face you guys in a 7 game series. These games are physically punishing (and take a toll on my heart).
Hard to watch
For the last several weeks they have been hard to watch, the D is very sloppy in their end and the O is just plain lazy. Other than Seguin and Marchaund seem like a lot of dead legs. How’s the ice time? Seems like long shifts.



























