Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Now They've Screwed Spurs, UEFA Willing To Review Rule

Bruins Come Close, But Drop Second Straight Game

Close, but no cigar. While that statement has relevance to the comeback Boston almost mounted in the third period, it can aptly describe the problems Boston faced all afternoon when moving out of their own zone. In a theme carried throughout Boston’s 2-1 loss to the Pittsburgh Penguins, the Bruins inability to capably breakout of their third of the ice cleanly was a deciding factor in today’s outcome. When Boston was successfully able to move the puck out of their zone, many of the clears were poor passes or simply chips with no real intended target.

Pittsburgh’s game winning goal, scored by Matt Cooke, came as a direct result of a bad clear - Dennis Seidenberg, feeling pressure below the goal line, fired a hybrid saucer pass/clearing attempt about waist-high toward Zach Hamill, who was unable to control the puck. Immediately corralled by the Pens and moved back into the B’s zone in what amounted to a 3-5 by the Pens. In a scene that could well be a microcosm of Boston’s recent defensive struggles, Cooke was able to take two chips at a rebound from a foot outside the crease, while all five Boston players were below the faceoff dots and three – Corvo, Hamill and Kelly – formed a triangle around Cooke to watched him put away the game winner without so much as putting a body on Cooke.

Star-divide

Pittsburgh kicked off the scoring to go up 1-0 with just nine seconds left in the first period as Evgeni Malkin put home a power play goal from a difficult angle to give the Pens some momentum headed into the intermission. Unlike prior games where the Bruins saved their best for the third period, Boston came out of the first intermission with good energy and generated some great opportunities in the second period, including a great pass from Seguin to a cutting Marchand that was steered just wide, but they were held scoreless through two periods.

Boston’s defense generated the bulk of the shots on goal for the game, including the team’s only goal in the game – after corralling a puck along the sideboards, Joe Corvo put a wrist shot on net that found its way through a screen and past Fleury 6:45 into the third. The final 10 minutes of the third provided a number of great scoring opportunities as Boston scrambled to put an equalizer on the board, but the Bruins weren’t able to get the goal they were looking for.

Despite the negative outlook of the previous three paragraphs, Boston could very well have won this game 4-1 or even 5-0 with just a few different bounces. However, it was another disappointing game for the home team, with the effort given at times not matching the effort needed to snap out of the funk. It’s said that you make your own luck, and based on the effort levels of both teams this afternoon, it was clear that Pittsburgh was the team determined to make their own luck, while the Bruins were just hoping for it to happen.


Comment 15 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Boston could very well have won this game 4-1 or even 5-0 with just a few different bounces.

Yeah, bounces like Seidenberg’s against Ottawa. Weren’t too many good chances by the forwards, we got kept to the perimeter all game long

by TomServo42 on Feb 4, 2012 4:55 PM EST reply actions  

I think we had more than that – Marchmont’s tip for Seguin, Hamill wiffing, Seguin’s breakaway. And had they locked down for 9 more seconds and put any type of pressure on Cooke, you’ve got a 3,4-0 game right there. It all comes down to effort though, which was spotty today.

Johnny Boychuk - The infamous bottle of $100,000 champagne, I thought it was meh.

by PeterMacKellar on Feb 4, 2012 5:03 PM EST up reply actions  

If we’re classifying one on four attempts and useless Providence players’ ineptitude as near misses, we should be winning a lot of games

by TomServo42 on Feb 4, 2012 5:57 PM EST up reply actions  

i'll have to disagree here too....

the score looked much closer than it really was. pittsburgh kept most of boston’s chances to the outside……i’m surprised it wasn’t 3-0 or 4-0 pittsburgh.

the physical play was lacking and when that happens the bruins aren’t gonna win. so pissed off that boychuk missed that cooke hit. if there’s one player that needed to be traded, he would be the first on my list. don’t get me wrong, it’s not because he missed that hit— he consistently makes poor decisions with the puck in the offensive zone, his shot is overrated (powerful and very inaccurate) and does not hit nearly as hard as people give him credit for.

by delta on Feb 5, 2012 9:06 AM EST up reply actions  

Did anyone see/know what happened to Seids? He apparently took about 20 stitches in his face, but I didn’t see what happened and if they mentioned how on NESN I missed that too.

Game was a disappointment, but the one positive was that they didn’t look as bad in this one as they have in other recent games and they didn’t give up more than 2 goals. They were kind of on a roll there giving up 3 or more per game.

They need to start finishing their chances and they need to learn how to capitalize on the PP-no reason they shouldn’t have scored with 4 minutes straight of PP time.

by TCL40 on Feb 4, 2012 5:12 PM EST reply actions  

One thing I noticed on the PP – they wasted a good 30-45 sec when Pevs couldn’t hold it in twice. Had to come out and regroup both times.

Johnny Boychuk - The infamous bottle of $100,000 champagne, I thought it was meh.

by PeterMacKellar on Feb 4, 2012 5:31 PM EST up reply actions  

In Pevs defense we think there may have been a rut there. The linesman went down once and looked like he caught an edge another time during that PP.

Even so, those two misses on the point were huge, and honestly not super characteristic of him. I like Pevs on the point-he is better than anyone else they have tried to use and he isn’t afraid to move.

by TCL40 on Feb 4, 2012 5:40 PM EST up reply actions  

agreed, he’s been the most effective look back there and unlike most everyone but Seguin on the PP units, actually looks through the box for passes

by TomServo42 on Feb 4, 2012 5:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Interesting point about a rut – was that just you noticed, or did they mention on NESN, too? I had NHLN so the Pens guys didn’t say anything about it that I remember.

I agree with Pevs being a good point option and he’s been very good when out there, but those two misses just killed the flow.

Johnny Boychuk - The infamous bottle of $100,000 champagne, I thought it was meh.

by PeterMacKellar on Feb 4, 2012 5:51 PM EST reply actions  

Damn, reply fail

Johnny Boychuk - The infamous bottle of $100,000 champagne, I thought it was meh.

by PeterMacKellar on Feb 4, 2012 5:54 PM EST up reply actions  

NESN guys didn’t notice it. I just remember we noticed the linesman go down in the same place once and lose an edge another time (think the linesman went down after the 2nd time Pevs missed). My daughter actually noticed it and made a comment that she wondered if there wasn’t something screwy with the ice, because in the same place Pevs misssed twice, she saw the linesman struggling to stay on his skates twice.

She is pretty observant.

by TCL40 on Feb 4, 2012 6:26 PM EST up reply actions  

That was a really good catch. I remember seeing the ref fall, but I didn’t put it together.

Johnny Boychuk - The infamous bottle of $100,000 champagne, I thought it was meh.

by PeterMacKellar on Feb 4, 2012 7:21 PM EST up reply actions  

hmmm,

That totally makes sense. I saw all that happen, but didn’t put 2 and 2 together there.

Kick his ass, Seabass!

by phonymahoney on Feb 5, 2012 10:44 AM EST up reply actions  

Good game all

I really, really don’t want to face you guys in a 7 game series. These games are physically punishing (and take a toll on my heart).

by Matt Shaffer on Feb 4, 2012 6:29 PM EST reply actions  

Hard to watch

For the last several weeks they have been hard to watch, the D is very sloppy in their end and the O is just plain lazy. Other than Seguin and Marchaund seem like a lot of dead legs. How’s the ice time? Seems like long shifts.

by WVBsFan on Feb 4, 2012 10:02 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

PUNCH ALL THE WHALES!

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Durling_headshot_small
NHL Playoffs 2012: Western Conference Finals Game Three Open Thread
Small
Dougie Hamilton OHL Jersey
Looch-t_cap_small
LA Kings - 2012 Stanley Cup Champions?
Durling_headshot_small
Belated USA-Canada IIHF Open Thread
Axe_small
Wishlist!
Milt_schmidt_small
The All-Boston Team: Summer Project
Small
Chance to win a Bruins Prize pack, anyone else have a few minutes for a university project?!
246904_10150207466208058_559893057_6815629_7738165_n_small
He said she said trade rumor thread
Small
NHL Playoff Format
Small
Thanks Chowder

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managing Editor

Thomas_small sarahconnors

Durling_headshot_small Ryan Durling

Editors

B75ed5811b_bradmarchand_09262006_small Phunwin

Me_small xokathryn

5531_630546183341_11011139_37429402_2472201_n_small Biz Jacobs

Doug_roma_small dwatson783

Authors

Small Scott Frano

Resized_small Kristian Limas

Profile_pic_small PeterMacKellar

427799_10150607786667127_578457126_9253226_1796777750_n_small Dave Carignan

Boooyyyccchhuuukkk_small Shelby Lefebvre