:format(webp)/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_image/image/47458308/usa-today-8856255.0.jpg)
More specifically, here is the goaltender interference Julien was challenging.
Julien would challenge the ruling, claiming (rightfully so) that there was goaltender interference by Joe Vitale. However, the ruling on the ice stood. Heres the rule on goaltender interference
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ pic.twitter.com/vNrSNZsXuB
— Dan Ryan (@bruinshockeynow) October 18, 2015
And the leagues ruling on the call.
Official ruling: No crime, and therefore a punishment for the Bruins pic.twitter.com/VFgJ2x5RjM
— Craig Morgan (@craigsmorgan) October 18, 2015
If this wasn't goalie interference, why was the Eriksson goal with Bergeron in front deemed goaltender interference?